...
首页> 外文期刊>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology: Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Opthalmologie >Eye Movement Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Perimetry: clinical performance and patient preference during glaucoma screening
【24h】

Eye Movement Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Perimetry: clinical performance and patient preference during glaucoma screening

机译:眼睛运动围绕和频率倍增围栏:青光眼筛查期间的临床表现和患者偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PurposeTo evaluate the screening accuracy of an Eye Movement Perimetry (EMP) in comparison with Frequency Doubling Perimetry (FDP) and to investigate the patient preference and perception towards these visual field screening methods.MethodsA total of 104 healthy subjects (mean age (SD) of 48 (14) years) and 73 glaucoma patients (mean age (SD) of 52 (13) years) were recruited. All the participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation including the 24-2 SITA standard protocol on the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). This was followed by the 26-point protocol in EMP and the C-20-1 protocol in FDP. During EMP, all subjects were instructed to fixate a central target and to look at the detected peripheral target, followed by refixation of the central target and Saccadic Reaction Time (SRT) towards each of the seen stimuli was calculated. Next, a questionnaire was administered to evaluate the patient preference and perception towards the perimetry techniques. Mean SRTs and Robin scores were used to plot Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves to determine the screening accuracies. From the questionnaire survey, the frequency distributions of the responses were calculated.ResultsRobin score and SRT were significantly increased in glaucoma patients in comparison with the age-matched healthy subjects (p<0.001). The ROC analysis revealed comparable Area Under the Curve (AUC) values (0.95, p=0.81) with a specificity of 95.2% for FDP and 96.2% for EMP with a sensitivity of 87.7%. Thirty-seven percent of the older age group (40years) and 65% of severe glaucoma patients showed preference for EMP over FDP.ConclusionsThis study results indicate that the customized protocol in EMP provides efficient and rapid means of screening visual field defects in glaucoma, which compared well with FDP. Elderly healthy participants and patients with moderate and severe glaucomatous defectspreferred EMP as it permitted natural reflexive eye movements thereby resembling a real-life test setting.
机译:puposeto评估眼球运动围绕(EMP)的筛选准确性与频率倍增(FDP)进行比较,并研究患者偏好和对这些视野筛查方法的感知。方法总共104个健康受试者(平均年龄(SD)招募了48(14)岁)和73名青光眼患者(平均年龄(SD)为52(13)岁)。所有参与者都接受了全面的眼科评估,包括Stumphrey现场分析仪(HFA)上的24-2 SITA标准协议。其次是EMP中的26点协议和FDP中的C-20-1协议。在EMP期间,指示所有受试者都被指示固定中央靶点并查看检测到的外周靶,然后将中央靶和扫视反应时间(SRT)进行修复,计算出每种可见的刺激。接下来,给予调查问卷以评估患者偏好和对周边技术的感知。平均SRT和罗宾分数用于绘制接收器操作特性(ROC)曲线以确定筛选精度。从调查问卷调查中,衡量响应的频率分布。青光眼患者的酵母菌分数和SRT显着增加,与年龄匹配的健康受试者相比(P <0.001)。 ROC分析揭示了曲线(AUC)值(0.95,P = 0.81)下的可比面积,特异性为FDP的95.2%,EMP的敏感性为87.7%。 37%的较大年龄组(40年)和65%的严重青光眼患者偏好于FDP的EMP。结论,研究结果表明,EMP中的定制方案提供了筛选青光眼的视野缺陷的有效和快速方法,这与FDP相比。老年健康的参与者和患有中度和严重的青光眼缺陷的患者,因为它允许自然反射眼球运动,从而类似于真实的测试环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号