...
首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Natural forests exhibit higher carbon sequestration and lower water consumption than planted forests in China
【24h】

Natural forests exhibit higher carbon sequestration and lower water consumption than planted forests in China

机译:天然森林具有比中国种植的森林更高的碳封存和较低的耗水量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Large-scale planted forests (PF) have been given a higher priority in China for improving the environment and mitigating climate change relative to natural forests (NF). However, the ecological consequences of these PF on water resource security have been less considered in the national scale. Moreover, a critically needed comparison on key ecological effects between PF and NF under climate change has rarely been conducted. Here, we compare carbon sequestration and water consumption in PF and NF across China using combination of remote sensing and field inventory. We found that, on average, NF consumed 6.8% (37.5 mm per growing season) less water but sequestered 1.1% (12.5 g C m(-2) growing season(-1)) more carbon than PF in the period of 2000-2012. While there was no significant difference in water consumption (p = 0.6) between PF and NF in energy-limited areas (dryness index [DI] & 1), water consumption was significantly (p 0.001) higher in PF than that in NF in water-limited regions (DI & 1). Moreover, a distinct and larger shift of water yield was identified in PF than in NF from the 1980s to the 2000s, indicating that PF were more sensitive to climate change, leading to a higher water consumption when compared with NF. Our results suggest NF should be properly valued in terms of maximizing the benefits of carbon sequestration and water yield. Future forest plantation projects should be planned with caution, particularly in water-limited regions where they might have less positive effect on carbon sequestration but lead to significant water yield reduction.
机译:大规模种植森林(PF)在中国获得了更高的优先事项,以改善环境和缓解相对于天然森林(NF)的气候变化。然而,这些PF对水资源安全性的生态后果在全国范围内较不太考虑。此外,很少进行关于PF和NF之间的关键生态效应的重点比较。很少进行。在这里,我们使用遥感和现场库存的组合比较PF和NF中的PF和NF中的碳封存和耗水量。我们发现,平均而言,NF消耗了6.8%(每次增长季节37.5毫米)的水但隔离1.1%(12.5g C m(-2)生长季节(-1))在2000期间比PF更多的碳2012年。虽然PF和NF在能量限制区域之间没有显着差异(P = 0.6)(干燥指数[DI]& LT; 1),但PF中的耗水量明显高于(p 0.001)水有限地区(DI& 1)中的NF。此外,在PF中鉴定了水产量的明显和更大偏移,而不是20世纪80年代至2000年代的NF,表明PF对气候变化更敏感,导致与NF相比较高的耗水量。我们的结果表明NF应在最大化碳封存和水产量的益处方面进行适当的重视。应谨慎计划未来的森林种植园项目,特别是在有限的地区,它们可能对碳封存的积极作用较小,但导致显着的水收益率降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号