首页> 外文期刊>Geoscience journal >Comparison of landslide susceptibility maps using random forest and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in combination with catchment map units
【24h】

Comparison of landslide susceptibility maps using random forest and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in combination with catchment map units

机译:随机森林和多变量自适应回归样条模型与集水地图单位组合的山体滑坡敏感性图的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is a critical tool for mitigating the damages caused by geologic disasters. The selection of map units and mathematical models greatly affects the efficiency of LSM. To obtain the most appropriate combination of map units and mathematical models, four scales of catchment map units (CMUs) were analyzed and random forest (RF) and multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARSpline) models were applied in Gero City, Japan. The percentage of correctly identified landslides and the areas under the relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the model performances. The results indicate that the RF model had higher prediction accuracy than the MARSpline model, especially when the size of the CMU was 0.09 km(2). A relatively high percentage of landslides fell into the high and very high landslide susceptibility classes (73%) and the lowest percentage of landslides fell into the very low landslide susceptibility classes (0.82%). The prediction-area (P-A) plots indicated that the prediction rates were higher for the RF model than the MARSpline model. The results of this study also suggest that the model accuracy can be increased if the appropriate CMU size is used. Therefore, the potential benefits of using the RF model in combination with the appropriate CMU size should be further explored using additional landslide-conditioning factors and other models.
机译:滑坡易感性测绘(LSM)是用于减轻地质灾害造成的损害的关键工具。地图单元和数学模型的选择大大影响了LSM的效率。为了获得地图单位和数学模型的最合适的组合,分析了四个集水地图单元(CMU)的尺度,随机森林(RF)和多变量自适应回归花键(Marspline)模型应用于日本Gero City。使用正确识别的山体滑坡和相对操作特征(ROC)曲线下的区域的百分比用于评估模型性能。结果表明,RF模型具有比Marspline模型更高的预测精度,尤其是当CMU的尺寸为0.09公里时(2)。相对较高的山体滑坡落入高而非常高的滑坡易感性等级(73%),山体滑坡的最低比例落入了非常低的滑坡易感阶级(0.82%)。预测区域(P-A)曲线表明,RF模型的预测速率比MARSPLINE模型更高。本研究结果还表明,如果使用适当的CMU大小,则可以提高模型精度。因此,使用额外的滑坡调节因素和其他模型,应进一步探索使用RF模型与适当的CMU大小相结合的潜在益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号