首页> 外文期刊>Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science >A soil tool kit to evaluate soil properties and monitor soil health changes in smallholder farming contexts
【24h】

A soil tool kit to evaluate soil properties and monitor soil health changes in smallholder farming contexts

机译:一种土壤工具试剂盒,评价土壤性质和监测小农农业背景下的土壤健康变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Smallholder farmers often face challenges in managing soil fertility due to limited inputs and high spatial variability on their farms. While improved knowledge of soil constraints could help them manage limited resources more effectively, formal soil analyses are typically out of reach due to high costs of testing and transport associated with regional analytical laboratories. To address these challenges, we assembled a tool kit that uses minimal reagents and low-cost equipment to provide in-field quantitative data that are comparable to formal laboratory methods. We validated our tool kit measurements against standard analyses conducted at national laboratories on soils collected from 36 smallholder farms in Kenya and 115 farms in Peru. Additionally, in Kenya, we evaluated two legume treatments, involving the incorporation of residues from: 1) Lablab purpureus (lablab), versus 2) Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean). The tool kit measurements that were considered include important indicators of soil health (such as permanganate oxidizable carbon (PDXC), available P, pH, particulate organic matter (POM), and aggregate stability) that can influence crop yields and multiple soil functions. PDXC and pH measured with the tool kit from Kenyan soils were highly correlated to those measured by a standard laboratory (R-2 = 0.77; R-2 = 0.56; respectively). The tool kit and standard laboratory available P were less well correlated, but also showed a highly significant positive relationship (R-2 = 0.30). Similar patterns were noted for PDXC, pH and available P measured in Peruvian soils (R-2 = 0.75; R-2 = 0.75; R-2 = 0.35; respectively). Importantly, the tool kit and standard lab analyses also displayed similar abilities to predict maize grain yield in Kenya. When used to detect soil impacts of incorporating P. vulgaris versus L. prpureus, only POM differed significantly between the two legume treatments, although L. purpureus was slightly higher for most of the beneficial soil health properties. Our findings suggest that the tool kit methods proposed here have broad applicability to smallholder farms for explaining variability in crop yields, assessing soil contexts, and quantifying management-induced changes in soil health.
机译:由于农场的投入有限和高空间变异性,小农农民往往面临挑战。虽然改善了土壤限制知识可以帮助他们更有效地管理有限的资源,但由于与区域分析实验室相关的测试和运输的高成本,正式的土壤分析通常是不可触及的。为了解决这些挑战,我们组装了一种使用最小试剂和低成本设备的工具套件,提供与正式实验室方法相当的现场定量数据。我们验证了我们的工具包测量,免受国家实验室在肯尼亚的36名小农农场收集的土壤中进行的标准分析的标准分析。此外,在肯尼亚,我们评估了两个豆类治疗,涉及从以下:1)Lablab purpureus(Lablab),与2)的去除(普通豆)的含量。被认为的工具试剂盒测量包括土壤健康的重要指标(如高锰酸盐可氧化碳(PDXC),可用的P,pH,颗粒状有机物(POM)和聚集稳定性),其能够影响作物产量和多种土壤功能。用肯尼亚土壤的工具套件测量的PDXC和pH与标准实验室(R-2 = 0.77; R-2 = 0.56测量的那些高度相关性。工具套件和标准实验室可用P不太良好,但也显示出高度显着的阳性关系(R-2 = 0.30)。在秘鲁土壤中测量的PDXC,pH和可用P(R-2 = 0.75; R-2 = 0.75; R-2 = 0.35;分别为类似的图案。重要的是,工具套件和标准实验室分析也表现出类似的能力来预测肯尼亚的玉米粮食产量。当用于检测掺入P.Vulgaris对L. pripures的土壤影响时,在两个豆类处理之间只有POM显着不同,尽管L. purpureus对于大多数有益的土壤健康特性略高。我们的研究结果表明,这里提出的工具套件方法对小农农场具有广泛适用性,用于解释作物产量的可变性,评估土壤环境,以及定量的土壤健康的管理诱导的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号