...
首页> 外文期刊>Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science >Differential responses of soil bacterial community and functional diversity to reductive soil disinfestation and chemical soil disinfestation
【24h】

Differential responses of soil bacterial community and functional diversity to reductive soil disinfestation and chemical soil disinfestation

机译:土壤细菌群落和功能多样性减少土壤消毒和化学土壤消防的差异响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Reductive soil disinfestation (RSD) and chemical soil disinfestation (CSD) are two common agricultural strategies for the elimination of soil-borne pathogens. However, the differences in soil bacterial microbiome and its associated functional characteristics between CSD and RSD are poorly understood. In this study, five soil treatments, un-treated control (CK), CSD with 0.5 t ha(-1) dazomet (DZ), RSD with 10 t ha(-1) ethanol (ET), 15 t ha(-1) sugarcane bagasse (SB), and 15 t ha(-1) bean dregs (BD), were compared. We evaluated their effects on microbial metabolic activity, functional diversity, nitrogen-related genes abundance, and bacterial community structure using Biolog analysis, real-time PCR, and high-throughput sequencing. RSD-related treatments improved soil metabolic activity, functional diversity, and the abundance of denitrifying genes to a greater extent than the DZ treatment. Carbon source utilization preference and bacterial community structure were strikingly altered by CSD and RSD practices. Bacterial richness, diversity, and evenness were notably lowered in the SB-and BD-treated soils compared with the CK and DZ-treated soils. Moreover, compared with the DZ- and ET-treated soils, the SB- and BD-treated soils harbored distinct unique and core microbiomes that were comprised of more abundant and diverse potentially disease-suppressive and organic-decomposable agents. Collectively, these results suggest that RSD practices incorporated with organic residues could considerably restore soil functional activity and diversity, and act as a potential agricultural practice for the development of disease-suppressive soils.
机译:还原土壤消毒(RSD)和化学土壤消毒(CSD)是消除土壤传播病原体的两种常见农业策略。然而,土壤细菌微生物组的差异及其CSD和RSD之间的相关功能特征差不多理解。在本研究中,五种土壤处理,未处理的对照(CK),CSD,具有0.5吨HA(-1)达唑(DZ),RSD为10 T HA(-1)乙醇(ET),15 T HA(-1 )比较甘蔗蛋白(Sb)和15吨(-1)豆渣(BD)。我们使用Biolog分析,实时PCR和高通量测序评估了它们对微生物代谢活性,功能多样性,氮素相关基因丰富和细菌群落结构的影响。 RSD相关的治疗改善了土壤代谢活性,功能多样性,以及比DZ治疗更大的反硝化基因的丰富基因。 CSD和RSD实践令人惊讶地改变碳源利用偏好和细菌群落结构。与CK和DZ处理的土壤相比,在SB和BD处理的土壤中,细菌丰富,多样性和均匀度明显降低。此外,与DZ和ET治疗的土壤相比,SB和BD处理的土壤覆有不同的独特和核心微生物,其包括更丰富和多样化的潜在疾病抑制和有机可分解的药剂。总的来说,这些结果表明,与有机残留物的RSD实践可大大恢复土壤功能活动和多样性,并作为疾病抑制土壤发展的潜在农业实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号