首页> 外文期刊>Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science >How accurately can soil classes be allocated based on spectrally predicted physio-chemical properties?
【24h】

How accurately can soil classes be allocated based on spectrally predicted physio-chemical properties?

机译:基于光谱预测的物理化学性质可以分配土壤类别如何准确?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Soil class maps are useful representations of the landscape distribution of holistic soil functions. However these are often only available as generalized classes at small cartographic scales. One reason is that allocating a soil profile to a class in most current soil classification system requires laboratory determination of many diagnostic soil properties. The advantage of reflectance spectroscopy along with the development of spectral libraries can provide a relatively low-cost solution to this problem. Reflectance spectroscopy has demonstrated its ability to rapidly predict soil physio-chemical properties; however prediction accuracy varies among soil properties. When properties predicted with different accuracies are used to substitute for traditional laboratory determinations in allocating a soil profile to a class, the resulting reliability of the allocation is questionable. The objective of this research is to explore whether the soil properties predicted by reflectance spectroscopy can be used to correctly allocate soil profiles into soil taxa at different hierarchical levels. Two hundred and six soil profiles were allocated to eight Orders, 12 Suborders, 23 Groups and 49 Subgroups according to Chinese Soil Taxonomy, with the help of ten soil properties predicted by spectra using ten-fold cross-validated PLSR modelling. The overall allocation accuracy at Order, Suborder, Group and Subgroup level was 98.5%, 98.5%, 87.7% and 76.0% respectively. These results show that soil reflectance spectroscopy can assist in allocation of profiles. When predicted soil properties with varying accuracy are used for soil allocation, propagation of prediction errors and model uncertainties must be considered. We propose the use of multiple indicators (RPD, confidence intervals, comparison of RMSE and threshold requirements) to evaluate the allocation results.
机译:土壤类地图是整体土壤功能景观分布的有用表示。然而,这些通常仅作为小型制图尺度的广义类别。一个原因是将土壤谱分配给大多数土壤分类系统中的课程需要实验室测定许多诊断土壤性质。反射光谱的优点随着光谱文库的发展,可以为这个问题提供相对低成本的解决方案。反射光谱表明其能够快速预测土壤物理化学性质;然而,预测精度在土壤特性之间变化。当采用不同精度预测的特性用于替代传统的实验室测定,在将土壤剖面分配给阶级时,所得到的分配可靠性是值得怀疑的。本研究的目的是探讨反射光谱预测的土壤性质是否可用于在不同的等级水平的土壤分类中正确地分配土壤曲线。根据中国的土壤分类,将两百六个土壤曲线分配给八个订单,12个次次次次次次次次次次次次次组,使用10倍交叉验证的PLSR建模预测的十种土壤性质。订单,亚达,集团和亚组水平的整体分配准确性分别为98.5%,98.5%,87.7%和76.0%。这些结果表明,土壤反射光谱可以有助于分配轮廓。当预测具有不同精度的土壤性质用于土壤分配时,必须考虑预测误差和模型不确定性的传播。我们建议使用多个指标(RPD,置信区间,对RMSE和阈值要求的比较)来评估分配结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号