首页> 外文期刊>Geobios: Paleontologie, Stratigraphie, Paleoecologie >The Unitary Association method in biochronology and its potential stratigraphic power between benthic and planktic organisms: A case study on foraminifers from Paleocene-Eocene strata of southern Egypt
【24h】

The Unitary Association method in biochronology and its potential stratigraphic power between benthic and planktic organisms: A case study on foraminifers from Paleocene-Eocene strata of southern Egypt

机译:底栖和综合生物学中的生物学及其潜在地层功率的单一结合方法 - 以南部南部古世纪 - 占领地层对多胺素的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although foraminifers have been extensively used for biochronology, no quantitative evaluation of the quality of their application is available. In this work we apply a quantitative approach - the Unitary Association (UA) method - to evaluate the relative quality of planktic and benthic foraminifers in biostratigraphy. Based on 12,321 specimens belonging to 65 planktic and 132 benthic foraminifer species in 117 samples from the Paleocene-Eocene strata of the Kharga-Baris Oases (Western Desert, Egypt), the potential stratigraphic resolution power of benthic foraminifers is quantitatively assessed and compared to planktic foraminifers. The UA method accounts for superpositional contradictions between sets of coexisting taxa and generates unitary associations, which are conceptually similar to Oppel zones. The analysis produced fifteen unitary associations for the Paleocene-Eocene benthic Foraminifera of the studied sections, instead of three classical zones; most of these unitary associations are easily identified by the restricted occurrence of a single species. Although planktic Foraminifera have a higher seriation reality leading to a more robust biozonation, benthic Foraminifera have a higher stratigraphic resolution, at least at such regional scale. Furthermore, there was a significant positive correlation between the number of unitary associations and the number of species (R = 0.78 for planktic and 0.70 for benthic foraminifers; both with p 0.001). These results corroborate that quantitative techniques may lead to a higher resolution in biochronology, even when applied to poor biochronological markers. Moreover, in contrast to simple spatiotemporal analyses, the Unitary Association method can accurately assess the stratigraphic potential of a given taxonomic group. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
机译:虽然传染媒体已经广泛用于生物结构,但没有定量评估其应用质量。在这项工作中,我们应用了定量方法 - 单一关联(UA)方法 - 评估生物数据库中血管和底栖火影物的相对质量。基于占kharga-baris oases(西部沙漠,埃及)的古典 - eocene阶层的117个样品中的12,321种属于65个综合体和132个底栖动物种类的物种,底栖传染料的潜在地层分辨率是定量评估的,并与综合体进行比较传教人员。 UA方法占共存分类群之间的超词矛盾,并生成统一关联,这些协会在概念上类似于OPPEL区域。分析产生了研究段的古烯eocene底栖食子脉的十五个酉关联,而不是三个古典区域;这些整体关联中的大多数通过限制发生单个物种容易识别。虽然Planktic Foraminifera具有更高的序列现实,但是底栖的Foraminifera具有更高的地层分辨率,至少在这种区域规模上具有更高的地层分辨率。此外,单一关联的数量与物种数量之间存在显着的正相关性(用于综合素的综合体和0.70的r = 0.78;均具有P <0.001)。这些结果证实了定​​量技术可能导致生物干燥中的较高分辨率,即使应用于差的生物结构。此外,与简单的时空分析相比,整体结合方法可以准确地评估给定分类组的地层潜力。 (c)2018年Elsevier Masson SAS。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号