首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based dentistry >Reminder systems during orthodontic treatment.
【24h】

Reminder systems during orthodontic treatment.

机译:正畸治疗期间提醒系统。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Data sourcesCochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline and Embase.Study selectionHuman randomised controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of reminders in orthodontics were included. Interventions including any form of participant reminder compared to a control. There were no limitations in terms of publication year, language or status. Primary outcomes measured were periodontal parameters and rate of attendance. Six secondary outcomes were also measured.Data extraction and synthesisStudy selection and data extraction were carried out independently by two reviewers, with a third reviewer utilised to resolve disagreements. Authors were also contacted if any further clarification was required with regards to missing data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Comparable outcomes were collated and analysed using a random-effects model, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.ResultsFourteen parallel randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Only nine contributed to the meta-analyses, as five were deemed high risk of bias. Of the trials, ten RCTs, six RCTs, five RCTs and four RCTs measured plaque scores, gingival scores, rate of appointment attendance, and the effectiveness of reminder on the development of white spot lesions (WSLs) respectively. Results were grouped into either short term (1-3 months) or long term (>3 months) outcomes. In the short term, gingival condition was healthier in the reminders group (SMD = -0.66 with 95% CI: -0.97 - 0.35) and a statistically significant difference favouring patients receiving reminders was also seen in terms of plaque control (SMD = -0.38 with 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.10). In the long term, similar outcomes were recorded, with a statistically significant SMD for plaque scores and gingival scores when reminders were used (SMD -1.51 with 95% CI: -2.72 to -0.30 and SMD -1.94 with 95% CI: -3.81 to -0.07 respectively). Development of WSLs and risk of failure/cancellation were also lower in the reminder group.ConclusionsThis systematic review highlights that there is moderate to high quality evidence showing the positive effect of reminders on oral hygiene and appointment adherence in orthodontic patients. The authors suggest further high quality RCTs with longer follow-ups would be beneficial to support the efficacy of this intervention.
机译:数据Sourcescochrane中央寄存器受控试验(中央),淡紫色,科学版,科学网络,MEDLINE和EMBASE.STUDY SelectionHuman随机对照试验评估了正畸学中提醒的有效性。与控制相比,包括任何形式的参与者提醒的干预措施。出版年份,语言或地位无局限。测量的主要结果是牙周参数和出勤率。还测量了六次二次结果。另一个审查员独立进行了达到的提取和综合选择和数据提取,其中第三次审查员有助于解决分歧。如果需要对缺失数据需要进一步澄清,也联系了作者。使用Cochrane工具评估偏差风险。使用随机效应模型进行可比较的结果并分析,相应的95%置信区间。富集富集的并行随机对照试验符合纳入标准。只有九个贡献的荟萃分析,因为五个被认为是高风险的偏见。试验,十个RCT,六个RCT,五个RCT和四个RCT,测量斑块评分,牙龈评分,预约率,提醒分别对白斑病变(WSLS)的开发的有效性。结果分为短期(1-3个月)或长期(> 3个月)结果。在短期内,牙龈状况在提醒组中更健康(SMD = -0.66,95%CI:-0.97 - 0.35),并且在斑块控制方面也看到了接受提醒的统计学上显着的差异差异(SMD = -0.38 95%CI:-0.65至-0.10)。从长期来看,记录了类似的结果,对于使用提醒时的斑块评分和牙龈评分的统计学上显着的SMD(SMD -1.51,带有95%CI:-2.72至-0.30和SMD -1.94,具有95%CI:-3.81分别为-0.07)。提醒集团的WSLS和失败风险/失败/取消的风险也较低。结论,系统审查强调,高度至高质量证据表明提醒对口腔卫生和预约患者的预约依赖性的积极作用。作者提出了进一步高质量的RCT,随访较长,可以支持这种干预的功效。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Evidence-based dentistry》 |2018年第4期|共2页
  • 作者单位

    Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle UK;

    Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle UK;

    Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 口腔科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 03:07:04

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号