首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Covered Wallstents for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: primary stent placement versus reintervention.
【24h】

Covered Wallstents for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: primary stent placement versus reintervention.

机译:覆盖恶性胆道阻塞的壁板:初级支架安置与重新营养。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Covered self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) are designed to prevent tumor ingrowth and can be removed if necessary. Only limited comparative data are available on the performance of covered SEMSs after primary placement versus reintervention. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of covered SEMS placement either as primary treatment or reintervention in patients requiring palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: This study involved 104 patients with unresectable malignant biliary strictures. INTERVENTION: Covered biliary SEMS placement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Stent patency, technical success, and patient survival. RESULTS: Covered SEMSs were placed as primary treatment in 48 patients (46%), and reintervention was performed in 56 patients (54%). At 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter, the Kaplan-Meier estimated fractions of all patients with patent stents were 94%, 84%, and 58%, respectively. Covered SEMSs remained patent until the patient's death in 75 of 89 nonsurvivors (84%). Although patency rates 3, 6, and 12 months after primary placement (100%, 93%, and 82%, respectively) were higher than those after reintervention (90%, 78%, and 48%, respectively), the differences were not statistically significant (P = .057). Overall, the most frequent adverse events were cholangitis (7%) and stent migration (4%). LIMITATIONS: The distribution of stricture locations differed among the groups, and survival data suggested the presence of more extensive disease in the primary treatment group at baseline. CONCLUSION: The clinical utility and safety of primary covered SEMS placement were confirmed. This study provides the most extensive evidence to date that reintervention with a covered SEMS can provide a useful palliative option.
机译:背景:覆盖的自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)旨在防止肿瘤沟槽,如果需要,可以除去。在初级放置与重新实施后,才有受限的比较数据可用于覆盖的SEM的性能。目的:评估所涵盖的SEMS放置的有效性和安全性,也是需要恶性胆管阻塞的患者的主要治疗或重新营养。设计:回顾性临床队列研究。设置:第三推荐中心。患者:这项研究涉及104名患者不可切除的恶性胆道狭窄。干预:覆盖胆道塞塞术。主要结果测量:支架通畅,技术成功和患者生存。结果:覆盖SEMS在48名患者(46%)中被置于初级治疗,并在56名患者(54%)中进行重新营养。此后在3,6和12个月,所有专利支架的Kaplan-Meier估计部分分别为94%,84%和58%。涵盖的SEM仍然是专利,直到患者在89个非Nonsurvivors的75名(84%)中死亡。尽管初级放置后的通畅率为3,6和12个月(分别为9.5%,93%和82%)高于重新入住后的(分别为90%,78%,48%),但差异不是统计学意义(p = .057)。总体而言,最常见的不良事件是胆管炎(7%)和支架迁移(4%)。限制:狭窄位置的分布在组中不同,生存数据表明基线初级治疗组中存在更广泛的疾病。结论:确认了临床实用性和主要覆盖的SEMS安置的安全性。本研究提供了最广泛的证据,迄今为止,通过覆盖的SEM重新入住可以提供有用的群体选项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号