首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Comparative study of NOTES alone versus NOTES guided by a new image registration system for navigation in the mediastinum: A study in a porcine model
【24h】

Comparative study of NOTES alone versus NOTES guided by a new image registration system for navigation in the mediastinum: A study in a porcine model

机译:单独的纸币对比较研究与媒体中的新图像登记系统引导的注意事项:猪模型的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) mediastinoscopy (MED) through the esophagus has proved to be feasible in the animal model. However, injury of the adjacent pleura and pneumothorax has been reported as a frequent adverse event when using a blind access. Objective: To assess the utility and safety of a CT-based image registration system (IRS) for navigation in the mediastinum. Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial in 30 Yorkshire pigs. Thirty-minute MEDs were performed: 15 MEDs were performed with IRS guidance (MED-IRS), and 15 MEDs were performed with a blind access. Setting: Animal research laboratory. Interventions: In both groups, the mediastinum was accessed through a 10-cm submucosal tunnel in the esophageal wall. Timed exploration was performed with identification of 8 mediastinal structures. Main Outcome Measurements: Technical feasibility, adverse events, and the number of mediastinal structures identified. Results: Thirty animals weighing 31.5 ?? 3.5 kg were included in this study. MED was not possible in 2 animals in the "MED with blind access" group but was possible in all MEDs performed with IRS. The mean number of identified organs was slightly higher in "with IRS-MED" (6.13 ?? 1.3) than with MED with blind access (4.7 ?? 2.3; P =.066). Moreover, the right atrium and vena cava were identified in more cases with IRS-MED than in MED with blind access (13 vs 3 and 15 vs 11, P =.000 and P =.03, respectively). There were 3 (23%) adverse events with IRS-MED and 4 (27%) with "MED with blind access" (P = not significant), with pneumothorax being the most frequent (2 and 3, respectively). Limitations: Nonsurvival animal study. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the IRS system appears feasible in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery MED and suggests that IRS guidance might be useful for selected procedures. ? 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
机译:背景:天然孔口分子内窥镜手术(注意)通过食道通过食道可行的含有食管镜片镜(Med)。然而,在使用盲目访问时,据报道,相邻的胸膜和气胸的损伤是常旅口的不良事件。目的:评估基于CT的图像登记系统(IRS)的实用性和安全性,用于在MediaStinum中导航。设计:30个约克郡猪的前瞻性,随机,对照试验。进行了三十分钟的药物:使用IRS指导(MED-IRS)进行15家MEDS,并进行盲目接入进行15个药物。环境:动物研究实验室。干预:在两组中,通过食管壁的10厘米粘膜隧道进入亚宫。进行定时探索,鉴定8个纵隔结构。主要结果测量:技术可行性,不良事件和所识别的纵隔结构的数量。结果:三十只动物重31.5 ??本研究包括3.5千克。在“盲目接入”组中的2只动物中不可能在2个动物中,但在所有的药物中都有可能。鉴定的器官的平均数量略高于“与IRS-MED”(6.13 ?? 1.3)略高于MED盲目访问(4.7 ?? 2.3; P = .066)。此外,在MUSE-MED的情况下,右心房和静脉静脉比在MED中识别出盲目访问(分别为13 Vs 3和15 Vs 11,P = .000和P = .03)。用IRS-MED和4(27%)有3个(23%)不良事件,“MED盲目接入”(P =不显着),气胸是最常见的(分别为2和3)。局限性:非育期动物研究。结论:本研究表明IRS系统在天然孔口外镜外科医学中似乎是可行的,并表明IRS指导可能对所选程序有用。还2013年美国胃肠内镜学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号