首页> 外文期刊>Games and economic behavior >On the optimal entry fee and reserve price for auctions with selective entry: A comment on Gentry, Li, Lu (2017)
【24h】

On the optimal entry fee and reserve price for auctions with selective entry: A comment on Gentry, Li, Lu (2017)

机译:关于具有选择性条目的最佳入场费和储备预备价:关于绅士,李,卢(2017)的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Gentry, Li, Lu (2017) (GLL henceforth) study an auction model with endogenous entry in which, before the entry decision, each bidder observes a private signal; a higher signal implies a better distribution for the bidder's valuation. GLL claim that the optimal reserve price is greater than the seller's value for the object on sale and that the optimal entry fee is positive. We prove that these claims are incorrect: The seller may want to subsidize entry to stimulate competition in the auction (through a negative entry fee or through a reserve price below the seller's value), or to provide appropriate entry incentives if a suitable reserve price is effective at maximizing total surplus and at extracting bidders' rents. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:绅士,李,卢(2017年)(GLL Helentsforth)研究了一个拍卖模型的内源进入,在进入决定之前,每个投标人都会观察私有信号; 更高的信号意味着投标人估值的更好分配。 GLL声明最佳储备价格大于卖方对象的销售价值,最佳的入场费是积极的。 我们证明,这些索赔不正确:卖方可能希望补贴入门,以促进拍卖中的竞争(通过负责费用或通过卖方价值的储备价格),或者如果是合适的储备价格,则提供适当的入境奖励 有效地最大限度地提高总盈余和提取投标人的租金。 (c)2019 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号