...
首页> 外文期刊>Expert review of vaccines >Effectiveness and safety of dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination versus separate administration or no vaccination in older adults: a meta-analysis
【24h】

Effectiveness and safety of dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination versus separate administration or no vaccination in older adults: a meta-analysis

机译:双流感和肺炎球菌疫苗接种的有效性和安全性与老年人的单独给药或没有疫苗接种:荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The advantages of dual pneumococcal and influenza vaccination in older adults have not been clarified and controversy remains regarding their optimal use. Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted on 25 January 2018 using PubMed, the Cochrane Library,mand Embase databases. Seventeen studies were selected ultimately for meta-analysis using a multi-step approach by two separate authors. Primary outcomes were pneumonia, pneumococcal pneumonia, influenza, hospitalization, and all-cause mortality rates, and the secondary outcome was adverse effects (AEs).Results: The additive preventive effects of dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination versus influenza vaccination alone for pneumonia and death were 15% (95% confidence interval [Cl]: 4-24%) and 19% (95% Cl: 6-30%), respectively. Compared with pneumococcal vaccination alone, dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination resulted in a 24% (95% Cl: 16-31%) reduction in pneumonia and a 28%(95% Cl: 13-40%) reduction in death. Compared with placebo or no vaccination, the effectiveness of dual vaccination was 29% (95% Cl: 14-42%) for pneumonia, 38% (95% Cl: 25-49%) for death, 35% (95%Cl: 22-46%) for influenza, and 18% (95% Cl: 6-29%) for hospitalization. Both vaccines showed acceptable safety profiles and AEs were mild or moderate. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the importance of concomitant influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in older adults.
机译:背景:较老年人的双肺炎球菌和流感疫苗接种的优点并未澄清并争议其最佳用途。方法:此元分析在2018年1月25日使用PubMed,Cochrane库,MANCEMASE数据库进行。使用两种单独的作者使用多步行方法最终选择17项研究进行Meta分析。主要结果是肺炎,肺炎球菌肺炎,流感,住院和全导致死亡率,次要结果是不利影响(AES)。结果:双流感和肺炎球菌接种的添加剂预防作用对肺炎和死亡单独流感疫苗接种分别为15%(95%置信区间[Cl]:4-24%)和19%(95%Cl:6-30%)。与单独的肺炎球菌接种疫苗接种相比,肺炎的双重流感和肺炎疫苗接种导致肺炎的24%(​​95%Cl:16-31%),死亡减少了28%(95%Cl:13-40%)。与安慰剂或无疫苗接种相比,肺炎的双重疫苗接种的有效性为29%(95%CL:14-42%),死亡38%(95%Cl:25-49%),35%(95%Cl: 22-46%)用于流感,18%(95%Cl:6-29%)用于住院。疫苗均显示出可接受的安全性曲线,AES温和或中等。结论:我们的研究结果突出了老年成年人伴随流感和肺炎球菌疫苗接种的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号