...
首页> 外文期刊>Expert review of vaccines >Management of meningococcal outbreaks: are we using the same language? Comparison of the public health policies between high-income countries with low incidence of meningococcal disease
【24h】

Management of meningococcal outbreaks: are we using the same language? Comparison of the public health policies between high-income countries with low incidence of meningococcal disease

机译:脑膜炎球菌疫情的管理:我们使用相同的语言吗? 脑膜炎脑病发病率低的高收入国家公共卫生政策的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in high-income countries usually occurs sporadically with low incidence and occasionally as small clusters or outbreaks. The WHO guidelines (GLs) for IMD outbreak applies only to African countries with high endemic incidence. Several high-income countries developed their own GLs on IMD outbreak, and we compare their terminology, classification, definitions, and public health interventions. Methods: National IMD outbreak GLs of the European Union and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development member states were compared. Due to linguistic barriers, 17 out of forty-one countries were selected, and the GLs on the websites of the national health authorities were independently screened by two researchers. Results: National GLs on IMD outbreak were available for 12 countries. All GLs classify IMD outbreak into organization and community based using different terminology (cluster, epidemic, etc.). Two GLs introduce also a third condition of hyperendemic. Definitions, thresholds, and countermeasures vary among countries. Conclusions: Different definitions of organization and community-based outbreaks and countermeasures are expected because of uncertainties about their effectiveness, and differences between countries in health-care systems and public health policy approaches. Nevertheless, variations in terminology, definitions and countermeasures are confusing and reflect the need for an international standardization.
机译:背景:高收入国家的侵袭性脑膜炎球菌疾病(IMD)通常以低发病率均匀地发生,偶尔为小簇或爆发。 IMD爆发的世卫组织指南(GLS)仅适用于具有高处理发病率的非洲国家。几个高收入国家在IMD爆发中开发了自己的GLS,我们比较他们的术语,分类,定义和公共卫生干预措施。方法:对欧盟国家IMD爆发GLS和经济合作与发展成员国组织进行了比较。由于语言障碍,选择了四十一国中的17个国家,并由两名研究人员独立筛选国家卫生当局网站上的GL。结果:12个国家可获得IMD爆发的国家GLS。所有GLS将IMD爆发到使用不同术语(集群,疫情等)的组织和社区爆发。两种GLS也引入了高级血症的第三种条件。国家的定义,阈值和对策在国家之间变化。结论:由于其有效性的不确定性,以及卫生保健系统和公共卫生政策方法之间的不确定性,预期了组织和基于社区爆发的不同定义和对策。然而,术语,定义和对策的变化令人困惑,并反映了对国际标准化的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号