首页> 外文期刊>Evolution and Human Behavior >The ecological rationality of helping others: Potential helpers integrate cues of recipients' need and willingness to sacrifice
【24h】

The ecological rationality of helping others: Potential helpers integrate cues of recipients' need and willingness to sacrifice

机译:帮助他人的生态合理性:潜在的帮助者将受助者的需求和牺牲愿意整合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Why do humans help others? Many theories focus on dimensions like kinship or reciprocity. On their surface, these theories seem unable to explain help directed at fleeting strangers. In response to this puzzle, researchers have proposed that the mind has ecologically rational systems for providing aid. These systems respond to cues that predicted adaptive behavior during human evolution, regardless of whether such cues continue to be predictive in modern environments. In three studies, we test for two cues that might predict whether a potential benefactor will help a potential recipient: the need of the recipient and the extent to which the recipient is willing to sacrifice for the benefactor. Both cues, in ancestral environments, have the potential to predict whether a long-term relationship might be established. Consistent with past research, we find that both cues matter: Needy people and people willing to sacrifice are helped more. However, the cues are not merely additive: In some cases, the cue of need is ignored and only willingness to sacrifice is used. We discuss these results in terms of recent evolutionary theories of emotions.
机译:为什么人类帮助他人?许多理论重点关注亲属或互惠等尺寸。在他们的表面上,这些理论似乎无法解释针对稍纵陌生人的帮助。为了回应这个谜题,研究人员提出了思想具有生态学的理性系统来提供援助。这些系统响应在人类演变中预测适应行为的提示,无论这些提示是否继续在现代环境中预测。在三项研究中,我们测试了两个可能预测潜在福利者是否有助于潜在收件人的提示:收件人的需要以及受援者愿意为福利器牺牲的程度。在祖先环境中,两个线索都有可能预测可能会建立长期关系。与过去的研究一致,我们发现两个提示都很重要:有需要的人和愿意牺牲的人得到了帮助。然而,提示不仅仅是积累:在某些情况下,需要忽略需要的提示,并且仅使用牺牲的意愿。我们在最近的情感化学理论方面讨论这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号