...
首页> 外文期刊>European Physical Journal Plus >Comparison between hydraulic and structural based anti-vortex methods at intakes
【24h】

Comparison between hydraulic and structural based anti-vortex methods at intakes

机译:摄入量液压和结构基于涡旋方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Surface vortices are the main reason of flow instability and entraining air and debris into the intakes. Using structural based anti-vortex facilities is a common method for dissipating vortices over the intakes. In the present experimental study, performance of a new hydraulic based anti-vortex method is compared with available structural based anti-vortex methods over the horizontal intakes. In the new approach dynamically high-risk surface vortices are eliminated by imposing a hydraulic jet at the formed vortex zone over the intake. The injected jet acts as a point source of external momentum in order to change the hydrodynamic condition of the formed vortex flow. Results show that the investigated hydraulic based anti-vortex device is more flexible and more hydraulically efficient than the structural based anti-vortex methods, especially when the intake Froude number is higher than 1.3.
机译:表面漩涡是流动不稳定和夹带空气和碎片进入摄入的主要原因。 采用基于结构的防涡流设施是一种常用的方法,用于在摄入量上消散漩涡。 在本实验研究中,将新的液压抗涡流法的性能与水平摄入量的可用结构基于结构的抗涡旋方法进行比较。 在新的方法中,通过在摄入量上施加在形成的涡流区处的液压射流来消除动态高风险表面涡流。 注入的喷射用作外部动量的点源,以改变形成的涡流流动的流体动力学条件。 结果表明,调查的液压抗涡流装置比结构基于结构的抗涡流方法更加柔韧,更柔软,特别是当进气FRoude数高于1.3时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号