...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >PP19?Use and impact of the pre-hospital 12-lead electrocardiogram in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): mixed methods study protocol
【24h】

PP19?Use and impact of the pre-hospital 12-lead electrocardiogram in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): mixed methods study protocol

机译:PP19?在主PCI时代(PHECG2)中的院前12-铅心电图的使用和影响:混合方法研究方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The pre-hospital 12-lead electrocardiogram (PHECG) is recommended in patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prior research found PHECG was associated with improved 30-day survival, but a third of ACS patients under EMS care did not have PHECG. Such patients tended to be female, older and/or with comorbidities. This previous study was undertaken when thrombolytic treatment was the main treatment for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); practice has since shifted to a predominant interventional strategy – primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Moreover, the previous study relied solely on data collected by the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP), which does not include information on symptoms, EMS personnel gender, and other factors that may influence decision-making. The PHECG2 study addresses the following research questions: a) Is there a difference in 30-day mortality and reperfusion between those who do and do not receive PHECG? b) Has the proportion of eligible patients who receive PHECG changed since the introduction of pPCI networks? c) Are patients that receive PHECG different from those that do not in social and demographic factors, and in pre-hospital clinical presentation? d) What factors do EMS clinicians report as influencing their decision to perform PHECG?Explanatory sequential Quan-Qual mixed methods study comprising 4 Work Packages (WPs): WP1 a population based, linked data analysis of MINAP from 2010–2017 (n=510,000); WP2 retrospective chart review of EMS records from 3 EMS; WP3 focus groups with personnel from 3 EMS. WP4 will synthesise findings from WP1-3.Gaining an understanding into the clinical and non-clinical factors influencing EMS clinicians’ decisions to record PHECG will enable us to develop (and later test through a randomised trial) an intervention to improve PHECG uptake and patient outcomes following an ACS event.
机译:在患有疑问医疗服务(EMS)的患者中,建议院前院前12-铅心电图(PHECG),疑似急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)。先前的研究发现,PHECG与改善的30天存活相关,但在EMS护理下的ACS患者中的三分之一没有PHECG。这些患者往往是女性,较旧和/或患者。此前的研究是在溶栓治疗是ST段抬高心肌梗塞的主要治疗时(STEMI);实践已经转移到主要的介入策略 - 初生经皮冠状动脉干预(PPCI)。此外,之前的研究完全依赖于心肌缺血国家审计项目(MINAP)收集的数据,该项目不包括有关症状,EMS人员性别和可能影响决策的其他因素的信息。 PHECG2研究解决了以下研究问题:a)30天死亡率和那些做的人之间的差异和不收到PHECG的差异? b)自PPCI网络引入以来,是否具有获得PHECG的符合条件的患者的比例? c)患者是否接受PHECG与不在社会和人口因子的那些,以及医院前临床介绍? d)EMS临床医生为影响其执行PHECG的决定而报告的因素是什么?解释性顺序QUAN-QUICMIC MEDURE研究包括4个工作包(WPS):WP1基于群体的矿物,2010-2017的锦鲤的链接数据分析(n = 510,000) ); WP2从3个EMS记录的Reprospective图表审查; WP3焦点小组与3个EMS的人员。 WP4将从WP1-3综合。鉴于影响EMS临床医生的临床和非临床因素的理解,以录制PHECG的决定将使我们能够开发(并通过随机试验进行测试),这是改善PHECG摄取和患者的干预ACS事件后的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号