首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Senior doctor triage (SDT), a qualitative study of clinicians’ views on senior doctors’ involvement in triage and early assessment of emergency patients
【24h】

Senior doctor triage (SDT), a qualitative study of clinicians’ views on senior doctors’ involvement in triage and early assessment of emergency patients

机译:高级医生分类(SDT),对临床医生对高级医生参与分类和早期评估急诊患者的定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the focus during the last decade on introducing interventions such as senior doctor initial assessment or senior doctor triage (SDT) to reduce emergency department (ED) crowding, there has been little attempt to identify the views of emergency healthcare professionals on such interventions. The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of SDT from the perspective of emergency hospital staff. A secondary aim of this study was to develop a definition of SDT based on the interview findings and the available literature on this process.Qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with participants of different backgrounds including senior doctors, nurses, paramedics and ED managers. Textual data were analysed using a template analysis approach.27 participants from 13 EDs across England were interviewed. SDT was viewed as a safety mechanism and a measure to control patient flow. The most prominent positive aspect was the ability to initiate early investigations and treatment. Various shortcomings of SDT were described such as the lack of standardisation of the process and its cost implications. Participants identified a number of barriers to this process including insufficient resources and exit block, and called for solutions focused on these issues. A proposed definition of an ‘ideal’ SDT was developed where it is described as a systematic brief assessment of patients arriving at the ED by a senior doctor-led team, which takes place in a dedicated unit. The aim of this assessment is to facilitate early investigation and management of patients, early patient disposition and guide junior staff to deliver safe and high-quality clinical care.This is the first national study to explore the opinions of various emergency and managerial staff on the SDT model. It revealed variable interpretations of this model and what it can and cannot offer. This has led to a standard definition of the SDT process, which can be useful for clinicians and researchers in emergency care.
机译:尽管在过去十年中瞩目,但在介绍高级医生初始评估或高级医生分类(SDT)以减少急诊部门(ED)拥挤的情况下,尽管有很少的尝试确定对此类干预措施的紧急医疗保健专业人员的观点。本研究的目的是从急诊医院工作人员的角度来了解SDT。本研究的次要目的是基于面试结果和此过程的可用文献来制定SDT的定义。在包括不同背景的参与者,包括高级医生,护士,护理人员和ed经理,对QualiTative半结构化电话采访进行了调节。使用模板分析方法分析了文本数据.27英格兰的13个EDS的参与者进行了采访。 SDT被视为安全机制和控制患者流动的措施。最突出的积极方面是启动早期调查和治疗的能力。描述了SDT的各种缺点,例如流程缺乏标准化及其成本影响。参与者确定了对此过程的许多障碍,包括资源和退出块不足,并调用了专注于这些问题的解决方案。建议的“理想”SDT的定义是制定的,其中被描述为对抵达高级医生领导的团队到达Ed的患者的系统简要评估,该团队在专用单元中进行。本评估的目的是促进患者的早期调查和管理,早期患者处置和指导初级工作人员提供安全和高质量的临床护理。这是第一个探索各种紧急和管理人员的意见的国家研究SDT模型。它揭示了这种模型的可变解释以及它可以而且不能提供的。这导致了SDT过程的标准定义,可用于临床医生和紧急护理的研究人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号