...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Collecting sexual orientation and gender identity information in the emergency department : the divide between patient and provider perspectives
【24h】

Collecting sexual orientation and gender identity information in the emergency department : the divide between patient and provider perspectives

机译:在急诊部门收集性取向和性别认同信息:患者和提供者观点之间的划分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the USA, The Joint Commission and Institute of Medicine have called for collection of patient sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) information in healthcare. In a recent study, we reported that ED clinicians believe patients will refuse to provide this information; however, very few patients say they would refuse to provide SO/GI. As part of this study, we interviewed patients and providers regarding the importance of collecting this information. While these interviews were briefly summarised in our prior report, the qualitative data warranted a more thorough analysis and exposition to explore provider and patient views as well as risks and benefits of collecting SO/GI.A purposive sample of 79 participants was recruited for semi-structured interviews between August 2014 and January 2015. Participants included community members who had a previous ED encounter and ED providers from 3 community and 2 academic centres in a major US metropolitan area. Interviews were conducted one-on-one in person, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using the constant comparative method.Fifty-three patients and 26 ED providers participated. Patients perceived collection of SO/GI to be important in most clinical circumstances because SO/GI is relevant to their identity and allows providers to treat the whole person. However, many providers felt SO/GI was not relevant in most clinical circumstances because similar care is provided to all patients regardless of SO/GI. Patients and providers agreed there are risks associated with collecting SO/GI in the ED.ED clinicians do not perceive routine collection of SO/GI to be medically relevant in most circumstances. However, patients feel routine SO/GI collection allows for recognition of individual identity and improved therapeutic relationships in the ED. These discordant perspectives may be hindering patient-centred care, especially for sexual and gender minority patients.
机译:在美国,联合委员会和医学院呼吁收集医疗保健的患者性取向(SO)和性别认同(GI)信息。在最近的一项研究中,我们报告说,ED临床医生认为患者将拒绝提供此信息;然而,很少有患者认为他们会拒绝提供所以/ GI。作为本研究的一部分,我们采访了患者和提供者,了解收集此信息的重要性。虽然在我们的事先报告中简要概述了这些访谈,但定性数据有权进行更全面的分析和阐述,以探索提供者和患者观点以及收集所以的风险和效益.A / GI.A的有目的样本为79名参与者被招募了半学2014年8月和2015年1月之间的结构化访谈。参与者包括来自美国主要大都市地区的3个社区和2个学术中心的先前ED遭遇和ED提供商的社区成员。采访一对一,录制和转录的逐字进行了一对一。使用恒定的比较方法进行分析数据。一款患者和26名ED提供商参加。在大多数临床环境中感知所以的患者的收集是重要的,因为所以/ GI与他们的身份相关并允许提供者对待整个人。然而,许多提供者在大多数临床环境中觉得如此/ GI不相关,因为对于所有患者提供了类似的护理,无论如何都是如此/ gi。患者和供应商同意在ED.ED临床医生中收集所以/ GI有关的风险不会在大多数情况下感知所以/ GI的常规收集。然而,患者感到常规所以/ GI收集允许识别ed中的个体身份和改善治疗关系。这些不和谐的观点可能是妨碍患者为中心的护理,特别是对于性和性别少数患者。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Emergency medicine journal: EMJ》 |2019年第3期|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Surgery Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA;

    Department of Emergency Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland;

    Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Yale School of Medicine New Haven;

    Department of Health Behavior and Society Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health;

    Center for Surgery and Public Health Harvard Medical School and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public;

    Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA;

    Department of Surgery University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA;

    Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School;

    Center for Surgery and Public Health Harvard Medical School and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 治疗学;
  • 关键词

    emergency department; research; epidemiology; qualitative research;

    机译:急诊部;研究;流行病学;定性研究;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号