首页> 外文期刊>European psychiatry: the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists >Gender-gaps and glass ceilings: A survey of gender-specific publication trends in Psychiatry between 1994 and 2014
【24h】

Gender-gaps and glass ceilings: A survey of gender-specific publication trends in Psychiatry between 1994 and 2014

机译:性别差距和玻璃天花板:1994年至2014年间精神病学特定出版趋势调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Background Within academic psychiatry, women are underrepresented in the higher academic ranks. However, basic determinants of women's lack of academic advancement such as publication activity are poorly understood. The present study examines women's publication activity in high-impact psychiatry journals over two decades and reports developments in the numbers of male and female authorship over time and across cultural areas. Methods We conducted a retrospective bibliometric review of all articles published in 2004 and 2014 in three high-ranking general psychiatry journals. Statistical comparisons were made between the two years and with results from a baseline assessment in 1994. Results The overall percentage of female authors increased from 24.6% in 1994 to 33.2% in 2004 to 38.9% in 2014. Though increases in female authorship were statistically significant for both decades, there was less difference between 2004 and 2014, indicating a possible ceiling effect. Rates of female first authors increased between 1994 and 2014, though to a lesser degree between 2004 and 2014. Numbers of female corresponding authors plateaued between 2004 and 2014. Within Europe, Scandinavia displayed the most balanced gender-wise first author ratios. Western European and Central European countries increased their rates of female first authors substantially between 2004 and 2014. Conclusions Despite gains in some areas, our study reveals considerable deficits in the diversity of the current academic psychiatric landscape. Ongoing efforts and interventions to enhance the participation of underrepresented groups on institutional, political and editorial levels are necessary to diversify psychiatric research.
机译:在学术精神病学中的抽象背景,妇女在高等教育队伍中受到尊重。然而,妇女缺乏学术进步的基本决定因素如出版物活动较差。本研究审查了二十年多十年多年来高影响精神病学期刊的妇女出版物活动,并在时间和文化区域报告了男性和女性作者的数量。方法我们对三项高级一般精神病学期刊进行了对2004年和2014年发表的所有文章的回顾性的审查。两年之间进行了统计比较,并于1994年的基线评估结果进行了结果。结果,女性作者的总体百分比从1994年的24.6%增加到2014年的33.2%至38.9%。虽然女性作者的增加是统计学意义的对于这两十年来说,2004年至2014年之间存在较少,表明可能的天花板效应。女性第一作者的率在1994年至2014年间增加,尽管在2004年至2014年期间的较小程度。2004年至2014年之间的女性通讯作者数量。在欧洲,斯堪的纳维亚在欧洲展示了最平衡的性别第一作者比率。西欧和中欧国家在2004年至2014年之间大大增加了女性第一作者的税率。尽管某些领域的收益,但我们的研究表明,目前学术精神病景观的多样性呈现了相当大的赤字。正在进行的努力和干预措施,以加强对机构,政治和编辑水平的代表性群体的参与是必要的,以使精神病学研究多样化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号