...
首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society >Addition of TLIF does not improve outcome over standard posterior instrumented fusion. 5–10 years long-term Follow-up: results from a RCT
【24h】

Addition of TLIF does not improve outcome over standard posterior instrumented fusion. 5–10 years long-term Follow-up: results from a RCT

机译:添加TLIF不会改善标准仪器融合的结果。 长期后续5-10年:RCT结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Between 2003 and 2005, 100 patients entered a RCT between transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion (TLIF) or posterolateral instrumented lumbar fusion (PLF). The patients suffered from LBP due to segmental instability, disc degeneration, former disc herniation, spondylolisthesis Meyerding grade <2. Functional outcome parameters as Dallas pain questionnaire (DPQ), SF-36, low back pain questionnaire (LBRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) were registered prospectively, and after 5–10 years.
机译:在2003年至2005年期间,100名患者进入了横切端腰椎体内融合(TLIF)或后侧仪表腰椎融合(PLF)之间的RCT。 由于节段性不稳定,椎间盘退化,前圆盘疝,脊柱型患者患者患者患者患有LBP患者患者。 功能结果参数作为达拉斯疼痛问卷调查问卷(DPQ),SF-36,低腰疼痛问卷(LBRS),oswestry残疾指数(ODI)正在前瞻性登记,5-10岁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号