首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Comparative Effectiveness of Radical Prostatectomy Versus External Beam Radiation Therapy Plus Brachytherapy in Patients with High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer
【24h】

Comparative Effectiveness of Radical Prostatectomy Versus External Beam Radiation Therapy Plus Brachytherapy in Patients with High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer

机译:自由基前列腺切除术与外梁放射治疗加上近距离放射治疗高风险局部前列腺癌的比较有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A previous study comparing external beam radiation therapy with/without brachytherapy (EBRT +/- BT) and radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa) did not find a difference in overall survival (OS) between the treatments. However, this study was limited by short follow-up and assessment of OS in patients of divergent age and comorbidities. We therefore compared OS of EBRT+ BT versus RP in comparatively young (<= 65 yr) and healthy men (Charlson Comorbidity Index = 0) with high-risk localized PCa in the National Cancer Database. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment was used to balance baseline characteristics. Median follow-up was 92 mo (interquartile range 78-108). Using IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, EBRT + BT was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with RP (hazard ratio = 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.43). In young and healthy men presenting with high-risk localized PCa, RP showed statistically significant OS benefit compared with EBRT + BT.
机译:以前的研究比较外部光束放射治疗与/不含近距离放射治疗(EBRT +/-BT)和自由基前列腺切除术(RP)的高危局部前列腺癌(PCA)在治疗之间没有发现整体存活(OS)的差异。然而,本研究受到不同年龄和合并症患者的短暂跟进和评估的限制。因此,我们将EBRT + BT与RP的OS与国家癌症数据库中的高风险局部PCA进行了相对年轻(<= 65岁)和健康的男性(Charlson合并指数= 0)。处理加权的反概率(IPTW)调节用于平衡基线特征。中位后续行动是92 Mo(第78-108号的四分位数)。使用IPTW调整的COX回归分析,与RP(危险比= 1.22,95%置信区间1.05-1.43)相比,EBRT + BT与所有导致死亡率的风险较高。在具有高风险本地化PCA的年轻和健康的人中,与EBRT + BT相比,RP显示出统计学显着的操作系统益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号