首页> 外文期刊>European journal of epidemiology >Dietary protein intake and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: results from the Rotterdam Study and a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
【24h】

Dietary protein intake and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: results from the Rotterdam Study and a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

机译:膳食蛋白摄入和全因和造成特异性的死亡率:鹿特丹研究的结果和预期队列研究的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evidence for associations between long-term protein intake with mortality is not consistent. We aimed to examine associations of dietary protein from different sources with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. We followed 7786 participants from three sub-cohorts of the Rotterdam Study, a population-based cohort in the Netherlands. Dietary data were collected using food-frequency questionnaires at baseline (1989-1993, 2000-2001, 2006-2008). Deaths were followed until 2018. Associations were examined using Cox regression. Additionally, we performed a highest versus lowest meta-analysis and a dose-response meta-analysis to summarize results from the Rotterdam Study and previous prospective cohorts. During a median follow-up of 13.0 years, 3589 deaths were documented in the Rotterdam Study. In this cohort, after multivariable adjustment, higher total protein intake was associated with higher all-cause mortality [e.g. highest versus lowest quartile of total protein intake as percentage of energy (Q4 versus Q1), HR = 1.12 (1.01, 1.25)]; mainly explained by higher animal protein intake and CVD mortality [Q4 versus Q1, CVD mortality: 1.28 (1.03, 1.60)]. The association of animal protein intake and CVD was mainly contributed to by protein from meat and dairy. Total plant protein intake was not associated with all-cause or cause-specific mortality, mainly explained by null associations for protein from grains and potatoes; but higher intake of protein from legumes, nuts, vegetables, and fruits was associated with lower risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Findings for total and animal protein intake were corroborated in a meta-analysis of eleven prospective cohort studies including the Rotterdam Study (total 64,306 deaths among 350,452 participants): higher total protein intake was associated with higher all-cause mortality [pooled RR for highest versus lowest quantile 1.05 (1.01, 1.10)]; and for dose-response per 5 energy percent (E%) increment, 1.02 (1.004, 1.04); again mainly driven by an association between animal protein and CVD mortality [highest versus lowest, 1.09 (1.01, 1.18); per 5 E% increment, 1.05 (1.02, 1.09)]. Furthermore, in the meta-analysis a higher plant protein intake was associated with lower all-cause and CVD mortality [e.g. for all-cause mortality, highest versus lowest, 0.93 (0.87, 0.99); per 5 E% increment, 0.87 (0.78, 0.98), for CVD mortality, highest versus lowest 0.86 (0.73, 1.00)]. Evidence from prospective cohort studies to date suggests that total protein intake is positively associated with all-cause mortality, mainly driven by a harmful association of animal protein with CVD mortality. Plant protein intake is inversely associated with all-cause and CVD mortality. Our findings support current dietary recommendations to increase intake of plant protein in place of animal protein. Clinical trial registry number and website NTR6831, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6645
机译:长期蛋白摄入与死亡率之间的关联的证据并不一致。我们旨在研究膳食蛋白与全因素和造成特异性死亡率的关联。我们跟踪了来自鹿特丹研究的三个子队列的7786名参与者,这是荷兰的一群人的队列。在基线(1989-1993,2000-2001,2006-2008)使用食物频率问卷收集膳食数据。遵循死亡,直到2018年。使用COX回归检查关联。此外,我们对最高的元分析和剂量 - 反应元分析进行了最高的与最低的荟萃分析,以总结来自鹿特丹研究的结果和先前的预期队列。在13.0岁的中位随访期间,鹿特丹研究中记录了3589人死亡。在这种队列中,在多变量调节后,较高的总蛋白质摄入量与较高的全导致死亡率相关[例如最高与总蛋白质摄入量的最高与能量百分比(Q4与Q1),HR = 1.12(1.01,1.25)];主要通过高等动物蛋白质摄入和CVD死亡率解释[Q4与Q1,CVD死亡率:1.28(1.03,1.60)]。动物蛋白摄入和CVD的关联主要由肉和乳制品造成蛋白质。总植物蛋白摄入与所有原因或造成特异性的死亡率无关,主要由谷物和土豆中的蛋白质的零关联解释;但从豆类,坚果,蔬菜和水果中摄入较高的蛋白质与较低的全因和造成特异性死亡率的风险较低。在包括鹿特丹研究的11个前瞻性队列研究中的荟萃分析中,在包括鹿特丹研究的荟萃分析中得到了证实的结果(350,452名参与者中的64,306人死亡):较高的总蛋白质摄入与较高的全导致死亡率相关[汇集RR最高最低位数1.05(1.01,1.10)];对于每5次能量百分比(E%)增量,1.02(1.004,1.04);再次主要由动物蛋白质和CVD死亡率之间的关联驱动[最高与最低,1.09(1.01,1.18);每5 e%增量,1.05(1.02,1.09)]。此外,在Meta分析中,较高的植物蛋白摄入与较低的全原因和CVD死亡率相关[例如对于所有原因死亡率,最高与最低,0.93(0.87,0.99);每5 e%增量,0.87(0.78,0.98),用于CVD死亡率,最高与最低0.86(0.73,1.00)]。迄今为止研究的证据表明,总蛋白质摄入量与全导致死亡率正相关,主要由动物蛋白质与CVD死亡率有害。植物蛋白摄入与全因和CVD死亡率相反。我们的调查结果支持当前的膳食建议,以增加植物蛋白的摄入代替动物蛋白质。临床试验登记号码和网站ntr6831,https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6645

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号