...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer: official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) >Reply letter to: Pitfalls and limitations of a single-centre, retrospectively derived prognostic score for phase i oncology trial participant - Reply to Füssenich et al.: A new, simple and objective prognostic score for phase i cancer patients
【24h】

Reply letter to: Pitfalls and limitations of a single-centre, retrospectively derived prognostic score for phase i oncology trial participant - Reply to Füssenich et al.: A new, simple and objective prognostic score for phase i cancer patients

机译:回复信:陷阱和限制单中心,回顾性衍生的阶段Incology试验参与者 - 回复Füssenich等人:癌症患者的新,简单和客观的预后分数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We thank Olmos and colleagues for their comments. As highlighted in our discussion validation of the Nijmegen model was needed. Olmos and colleagues compared the Nijmegen score with the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score, described by Arkenau and colleagues, using the data collected from the European Drug Development Network (EDDN) (not available online), a collaboration of 14 phase I centres in seven European countries.
机译:我们感谢Olmos及其同事的意见。 正如我们在我们讨论的讨论中强调所需的尼斯·纳米策略。 奥米斯和同事将尼伯格·尼斯·马斯顿医院(RMH)分数与Arkenau及其同事描述,使用从欧洲药物开发网络(EDDN)所收集的数据(未在线提供),14阶段I Centres 七个欧洲国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号