...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of wildlife research >Performance of ground-based and aerial survey methods for monitoring wildlife assemblages in a conservation area of northern Tanzania
【24h】

Performance of ground-based and aerial survey methods for monitoring wildlife assemblages in a conservation area of northern Tanzania

机译:坦桑尼亚北部保护区野生动植物组合的地面和空中调查方法的表现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Validating and improving field-sampling techniques for estimating wildlife community composition and population size is essential for wildlife management and conservation. We conducted ground distance sampling surveys along line transects and block counts from a small aircraft in Manyara Ranch in Northern Tanzania and contrasted estimates of species richness and species-specific densities from both sampling techniques. We used regression analyses (logistic regression and generalized linear mixed models) and model selection to investigate whether a species' body size, group size, body color, as well as vegetation cover explained the variation in species presence/absence and relative density differences in aerial vs. ground-based sampling. Ground surveys detected significantly more species than aerial surveys. However, aerial surveys detected three species that were missed by ground surveys (African lions, African buffalo, and spotted hyena). Model selection suggested that species with smaller body mass and small group sizes were more likely to be missed in aerial surveys. Densities estimated from the aerial surveys were generally but non-significantly lower than the densities estimated from the ground surveys, with the exception of density estimates for African elephants which were slightly higher from aerial surveys. Density differences between the two methods were greater for species with small group size, light body color, and in areas with denser vegetation cover; these variables explained 75% of the variation in density differences between the two survey methods. Albeit being similar in operational costs in our relatively small study area, ground surveys yielded (1) more complete information with respect to wildlife community composition and (2) density estimates were mostly higher and (3) more precise and (4) appear more feasible to be implemented in community-based conservation schemes.
机译:验证和改善探测野生动物群落组成和人口规模的现场采样技术对于野生动物管理和保护至关重要。我们沿着坦桑尼亚北部的多马拉牧场中的一架小型飞机的线路横断波和块计数进行了地面距离,并从两种采样技术中对比物种丰富度和物种特异性密度的估计。我们使用回归分析(Logistic回归和广义线性混合模型)和模型选择来研究物种的体型,群体大小,身体颜色以及植被覆盖是否解释了在天线中的物种存在/缺失和相对密度差异的变化与基于地面的抽样。地面调查比空中调查更大的物种。然而,空中调查检测到由地面调查(非洲狮子,非洲水牛和察觉鬣狗)错过的三种物种。模型选择表明,在空中调查中,更容易错过具有较小体重和小组尺寸的物种。从空中调查估计的密度通常但非显着低于地面调查的密度,除了从空中调查略高的非洲大象的密度估计。对于小型群体尺寸,轻体颜色和具有更密集植被覆盖的区域,两种方法之间的密度差异更大;这些变量解释了两种测量方法之间的密度差异的75%。尽管在我们相对较小的研究区域中的运营成本类似,所产生的地面调查(1)关于野生动物群落组成的更完整的信息和(2)密度估计大部分更高,(3)更精确,(4)看起来更加可行在基于社区的保护方案中实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号