首页> 外文期刊>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery: official publication of the European Trauma Society >Early results after operatively versus non-operatively treated flail chest: a retrospective study focusing on outcome and complications
【24h】

Early results after operatively versus non-operatively treated flail chest: a retrospective study focusing on outcome and complications

机译:可操作性地与非可操作处理的枷锁之后的早期效果:重点研究了对结果和并发症的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Flail chest was traditionally treated non-operatively using mechanical ventilation and pain control. In order to reduce the occurrence of ventilation-associated complications and long-term disability, operative rib fixation is becoming a proven standard therapy for these patients. However, the consequences of the surgical complications may influence success rates negatively. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of flail chest treatment by surgical rib fixation with non-operative treatment, with special focus on the impact of surgical complications. Methods A retrospective case series of operatively treated flail chest patients was compared with non-operatively treated patients. Patients' injury and treatment characteristics and outcome parameters (e.g., duration of mechanical ventilation, length of Intensive Care stay (ICLOS) and hospital length of stay (HLOS), mortality, surgery-related complications and pneumonia) were collected from the patients' medical files. Crude and matched-pairs analyses were performed in SPSS. Results Twenty-three operatively and 47 non-operatively treated patients were enrolled. Operatively treated patients required significantly shorter mechanical ventilation; median 4 days versus 12 days for the non-operative group (p = 0.011). The matched-pairs analysis also showed a lower pneumonia rate (35% versus 80%;p = 0.035) and a shorter HLOS (median 21 versus 23 days;p = 0.028) in the operative group. No significant differences in duration of ICLOS, and occurrence of other injury-related adverse events were found between both groups. Seven surgery-related complications occurred, of which three required invasive solutions. Conclusions Operative fixation of a flail chest in trauma patients results in a lower rate of pneumonia, less mechanical ventilation days and shorter hospital stay, compared with non-operative treatment, but at the cost of surgery-related complications requiring invasive solutions in some cases.
机译:目的使用枷锁传统上使用机械通风和疼痛控制不可操作地对待。为了减少通风相关的并发症和长期残疾的发生,可操作的肋骨固定是这些患者的经过验证的标准治疗。然而,手术并发症的后果可能会产生负面的成功率。本研究的目的是通过手术肋骨固定与非手术治疗进行比较枷锁治疗的结果,特别关注手术并发症的影响。方法对患者无可操作性治疗的患者进行了一种可操作处理的枷锁胸部患者的回顾性案例。患者的伤害和治疗特征和结果参数(例如,机械通气的持续时间,重症监护休息时间​​(ICLOS)和医院的住宿时间(HLOS),死亡率,手术相关的并发症和肺炎)被从患者的医学中收集文件。在SPSS中进行了原油和匹配对分析。结果二十三名可操作和47名不可操可操作治疗的患者均已注册。可操作地治疗的患者需要较短的机械通气;中位数4天与非操作组12天(P = 0.011)。匹配对分析还显示出较低的肺炎率(35%对80%; P = 0.035),并且在手术组中较短的HLO(中位数21与23天; P = 0.028)。在两组之间发现ICLOS持续时间没有显着差异,并且在这两个群体之间发现了其他相关不良事件的发生。 nseven与手术相关的并发症发生,其中三种必需的侵入式解决方案。结论创伤患者的枷锁箱的手术固定导致肺炎率较低,机械通气日较少,住院时间较短,与非手术治疗相比,但在某些情况下,需要侵入性解决方案的手术相关并发症的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号