...
首页> 外文期刊>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience >Antisaccade and prosaccade eye movements in individuals clinically at risk for psychosis: comparison with first-episode schizophrenia and prediction of conversion
【24h】

Antisaccade and prosaccade eye movements in individuals clinically at risk for psychosis: comparison with first-episode schizophrenia and prediction of conversion

机译:在临床上临床上的反剖解和皮肤病眼球运动对精神病风险:与第一集中精神分裂症和转换预测的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Saccadic eye movements are well-described markers of cerebral function and have been widely studied in schizophrenia spectrum populations. However, less is known about saccades in individuals clinically at risk for schizophrenia. Therefore, we studied individuals in an at-risk mental state (ARMS) (N = 160), patients in their first episode of schizophrenia (N = 32) and healthy controls (N = 75). N = 88 ARMS participants showed an early at-risk mental state (E-ARMS), defined by cognitive-perceptive basic symptoms (COPER) or a combination of risk and loss of function, whereas N = 72 were in a late at-risk mental state (L-ARMS), defined by attenuated psychotic symptoms or brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms. We examined prosaccades, reflecting overt attentional shifts, and antisaccades, measuring inhibitory control, as well as their relationship as an indicator of the interplay of bottom-up and top-down influences. L-ARMS but not E-ARMS participants had increased antisaccade latencies compared to controls. First-episode patients had higher antisaccade error rates compared to E-ARMS participants and controls, and increased latencies compared to all other groups. Prosaccade latencies did not differ between groups. We observed the expected negative correlation between prosaccade latency and antisaccade error rate, indicating that individuals with shorter prosaccade latencies made more antisaccade errors. The magnitude of the association did not differ between groups. No saccadic measure predicted conversion to psychosis within 2 years. These findings confirm the existence of antisaccade impairments in patients with schizophrenia and provide evidence that volitional response generation in the antisaccade task may be affected even before onset of clinically overt psychosis.
机译:扫视眼球运动是脑功能的良好描述的标志物,并已广泛研究精神分裂症谱群。然而,较少关于临床上的个体囊肿的横向患有精神分裂症的疾病。因此,我们研究了患有风险精神状态(武器)(n = 160)的个体,患者在他们的第一个精神分裂症(n = 32)和健康对照(n = 75)中。 n = 88次武器参与者显示出一种早期的危险精神状态(E-Arms),由认知感知的基本症状(Coper)或功能风险和功能丧失的组合,而n = 72则处于晚期风险精神状态(L形臂),由减毒精神症状或短暂的间歇性精神病症状定义。我们审查了不清楚,反映了明显的注意力转变和反侦测,测量抑制控制,以及它们作为自下而下和自上而下的反相的指标的关系。与对照组相比,L形臂但不是电子武器参与者增加了反逐步的延迟。与电子武器参与者和控制器相比,第一集集患者具有更高的反易分析误差率,并与所有其他组相比增加了延迟。 ProsAccade Latence在组之间没有差异。我们观察了ProsaCcade延迟和反坐足式错误率之间的预期负相关,表明具有更短的PryAccade Latementies的个体使得更多的反察觉错误。关联的幅度在组之间没有区别。没有扫视措施在2年内预测对精神病的转换。这些发现证实存在精神分裂症患者反损伤障碍,并提供证据表明,即使在临床上公开精神病之前也可能会影响反诊断任务中的激动反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号