首页> 外文期刊>European geriatric medicine. >P-499: Communication between hospital and ambulatory care: is it enough for special administration drugs? Example of zoledronic acid and intravenous iron therapy in geriatric ward
【24h】

P-499: Communication between hospital and ambulatory care: is it enough for special administration drugs? Example of zoledronic acid and intravenous iron therapy in geriatric ward

机译:P-499:医院和外国护理之间的沟通:是否足以用于特殊施用药物? 老年病房中唑酸酸和静脉注射铁疗法的实例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: To ensure the continuity of treatment, the communication between hospital and ambulatory care is crucial. Most of the drugs appear on the prescription after the discharge but others, with special administration rate doesn't. The hospitalization report is transmitted to the patient's physician, therefore it is an important tool of communication. This is the case for zoledronic acid (ZA) and intravenous iron therapy (IIT), two treatments often used in elderly patients. ZA is an intravenous bisphosphonate administered once a year. IIT (carboxy-maltose iron) is a supplementation therapy administered once, possibly divided in two administrations separated by a week; the dose needed is calculated based on hemoglobin level and patient's weight. The aim of this study was to assess the traceability of ZA and IIT in the hospitalization report of patients hospitalized in geriatric unit. Methods: This is a monocentric retrospective study conducted in the acute geriatric unit of a French University hospital. All patients who received ZA or IIT in 2018 were included. Patients who died during their stay were excluded. Data were extracted from our computerized physician order entry; hospitalization reports and medical records were screened to assess the traceability of the administration and the posology (for IIT only). Results: Among the 12 ZA treatments prescribed, all of them were traced in the hospitalization report. The nurse traced the administration in the software for all of them. During the study period, 127 patients received an IIT. Most of them were traced in the hospitalization report (91.3%) and posology was specified in 95 of them (82%). The nurse traced the administration in the software for 117 patients (92%). Conclusion: ZA and IIT administrations are well traced in the hospitalization report of patients hospitalized in the acute geriatric unit. This is a key element in order to ensure the safety and efficacy of these drugs. ZA is often initiated during hospitalization, the ulterior administrations are ambulatory each year. IIT can only be done in a hospital but it's efficiency must be assessed by the patient's physician after a month. Therefore, he has to be informed of the treatment (date, dosage). An education of the medical staff was realized to sensitize them to the importance of the communication between hospital and ambulatory care via the traceability of special administration drugs in the hospitalization report.
机译:介绍:为确保治疗的连续性,医院与动态护理之间的沟通至关重要。大多数药物出现在出院后的处方,但其他药物,特殊给药率没有。住院报告被传送到患者的医生,因此它是一个重要的沟通工具。这种情况是唑醇酸(ZA)和静脉注射铁治疗(IIT),两种治疗常用于老年患者。 Za是一年一次施用一次静脉的双膦酸盐。 IIT(羧基麦芽糖铁)是一次性施用的补充疗法,可能分为两周分隔的两个施用;所需剂量是基于血红蛋白水平和患者的重量来计算的。本研究的目的是评估ZA和IIT在住院病患者住院报告中的可追溯性。方法:这是在法国大学医院的急性老年节单位进行的单眼回顾研究。包括2018年收到ZA或IIT的所有患者。在他们逗留期间死亡的患者被排除在外。从我们的计算机化医师订单输入中提取数据;筛查住院报告和医疗记录,以评估给药和病毒的可追溯性(仅限IIT)。结果:规定的12种ZA治疗中,所有这些都在住院报告中追踪。护士追溯到所有这些软件中的管理。在研究期间,127名患者接受了IIT。其中大多数在住院报告中追踪(91.3%),病毒学在其中95名(82%)中规定。护士在软件中追溯到117名患者(92%)。结论:ZA和IIT主管部门在急性老年特性单位住院患者的住院报告中擅长。这是一个关键因素,以确保这些药物的安全性和功效。 ZA经常在住院期间发起,别司法主管部门每年都是动态的。 IIT只能在医院完成,但必须在一个月后患者的医生评估它的效率。因此,他必须了解治疗(日期,剂量)。经医务人员的教育,通过在住院报告中的特殊施用药物的可追溯性来敏感他们对医院和外国护理之间的沟通的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号