首页> 外文期刊>European geriatric medicine. >P-592: Intervention elements to reduce inappropriate prescribing for older adults with multimorbidity receiving outpatient care: a scoping review
【24h】

P-592: Intervention elements to reduce inappropriate prescribing for older adults with multimorbidity receiving outpatient care: a scoping review

机译:P-592:干预元素,减少对具有多元成年人的不适当的较阳性成年人,接受门诊护理:范围审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: Polypharmacy occurs in approximately 30% of older adults aged 65 years or more [1], particularly among those with multimorbidity. With polypharmacy, there is an associated risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). This scoping review aims to identify the intervention elements that have been adopted to reduce PIP in the outpatient setting. Methods: The scoping review was guided by the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley [2]. Electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane), grey literature sources, six key geriatrics journals (e.g., Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Age and Ageing) and the reference lists of review papers were searched. Intervention elements extracted from the included studies were mapped onto the intervention functions of the Behaviour Change Wheel [3]. Results: Of 8204 studies identified, 79 studies were included in the final analysis. Included studies comprised randomized controlled trials, study protocols and abstracts. From the 79 interventions, 14 elements were identified. An average of two to three elements was adopted in each intervention. The top three most commonly used intervention elements were medication review (87%), training (26%) and tool/instrument(s) (23%). 60% of the medication reviews involved pharmacists. The 14 intervention elements were mapped onto five intervention functions: "education", "persuasion", "training", "environmental restructuring" and "enablement". Key conclusion: PIP is a multi-faceted problem that involves multiple stakeholders. An intervention against PIP will require multiple elements to target the behaviours of each stakeholder. The intervention elements and their respective functions identified in this scoping review will provide invaluable insight when designing a complex intervention that aims to reduce PIP.
机译:介绍:多药地发生在65岁以上的大约30%以上[1],特别是具有多重无水的人。随着PolyPharmacy,存在潜在不恰当的处方(PIP)的风险。此裁视审查旨在识别所采用的干预元素,以减少门诊设置。方法:采用范围审查是由Arksey和O'Malley开发的方法论框架引导的。电子数据库(PubMed,Cinahl,Embase,Sement,Cochrane),灰色文学来源,六个关键的老年学习期刊(例如,美国老年学会社会,年龄和老龄化学报)以及审查论文的参考名单。从附带的研究中提取的干预元素被映射到行为变化轮的介入功能上[3]。结果:鉴定了8204项研究,最终分析中包含79项研究。包括的研究包括随机对照试验,研究协议和摘要。从79个干预措施,确定了14个要素。每次干预采用平均两到三个元素。前三名最常用的干预元素是药物评论(87%),培训(26%)和工具/仪器(23%)。 60%的药物评论涉及药剂师。 14个干预要素映射到五个干预职能:“教育”,“劝说”,“培训”,“环境重组”和“支持”。关键结论:PIP是一个涉及多个利益相关者的多面问题。对针对PIP的干预将需要多个元素来针对每个利益相关者的行为。在该范围审查中确定的干预元素及其各自的函数将在设计旨在减少PIP的复杂干预时提供宝贵的洞察力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号