首页> 外文期刊>European child & adolescent psychiatry >Advancing the study of sluggish cognitive tempo via DSM, RDoC, and hierarchical models of psychopathology
【24h】

Advancing the study of sluggish cognitive tempo via DSM, RDoC, and hierarchical models of psychopathology

机译:通过DSM,RDOC和精神病理学分层模型推进对缓慢认知节奏的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) is separable from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other psychopathologies, and growing evidence demonstrates SCT to be associated with impairment in both children and adults. However, it remains unclear how SCT should optimally be conceptualized. In this article, we argue that multiple models of psychopathology should be leveraged to make substantive advances to our understanding of SCT. Both categorical and dimensional approaches should be used, including the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) nosology, the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, and hierarchical models of psychopathology. Studies are needed to determine whether individuals categorized with SCT can be reliably identified and differentiated from individuals without SCT in pathophysiological, neuropsychological, behavioral, and daily life functioning. Studies are also needed to evaluate the validity and utility of SCT as a transdiagnostic and dimensional construct. In considering SCT as a dimensional and potentially transdiagnostic construct, we describe ways in which SCT might be examined within the RDoC framework, including negative valence systems, cognitive systems, and arousal/regulatory systems, as well as within hierarchical models of psychopathology. Conceptualizing SCT within both categorical and dimensional models of psychopathology will help to better understand the causes, developmental pathways, and clinical implications of SCT, both as a construct in its own right and also in relation to other psychopathologies.
机译:缓慢的认知节奏(SCT)可分离注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和其他精神病理学,并且越来越多的证据表明SCT与儿童和成年人的障碍有关。但是,它仍然尚不清楚SCT应该如何最佳地概念化。在本文中,我们争辩说,应利用多种机动病理学模型,以使我们对SCT的理解进行实质性进步。应使用分类和尺寸方法,包括精神障碍诊断和统计手册(DSM)危害,研究域标准(RDOC)倡议,以及精神病理学的层次模型。需要研究以确定是否可以可靠地识别分类的个体,并且在病理生理学,神经心理学,行为和日常生活中的情况下,不可能可靠地鉴定和分化。还需要研究来评估SCT作为跨诊断和尺寸构建体的效力和效用。在考虑SCT作为尺寸和潜在的跨透明度构建体中,我们描述了可以在RDOC框架内检验SCT的方法,包括负价系统,认知系统和唤起/监管系统,以及精神病理学的分层模型。在精神病理学的分类和尺寸模型中概念化SCT将有助于更好地理解SCT的原因,发育途径和临床意义,既可以在其自己的权利和与其他精神病理学相关的构建体中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号