首页> 外文期刊>European child & adolescent psychiatry >Comparing the DSM-5 construct of Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder and ICD-10 Mixed Disorder of Emotion and Conduct in the UK Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms (UK-LAMS) Study
【24h】

Comparing the DSM-5 construct of Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder and ICD-10 Mixed Disorder of Emotion and Conduct in the UK Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms (UK-LAMS) Study

机译:比较破坏性情绪失调障碍的DSM-5构建和ICD-10情感混合紊乱和英国纵向评估躁狂症状(UK-LAMS)研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It is important to understand new diagnostic entities in classifications of psychopathology such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) (code F34.8) construct of Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD) and to compare it with possible equivalent disorders in other classificatory systems such as the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10), which has a category that superficially appears similar, that is, Mixed Disorder of Emotion and Conduct (MDEC) (code F92). In this study, the United Kingdom (UK) arm (UK-LAMS) of the US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) supported Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms (LAMS) multi-site study was used to evaluate and retrospectively construct DMDD and MDEC diagnoses in order to compare them and understand the conditions they co-occur with, in order to improve the clinical understanding. In particular, the phenomenology of UK-LAMS participants ( n ?=?117) was used to determine whether DMDD is a unique entity within the DSM-5. The findings showed that 24 of 68 participants with either DMDD or MDEC (35.3%) fulfilled both diagnostic criteria for DMDD and MDEC, suggesting that these entities do contain overlapping features, particularly symptoms relating to Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)/Conduct Disorder (CD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)/Hyperkinetic Disorder (HKD) and/or an anxiety disorder. The data also showed that most of the participants who met DMDD criteria also fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for ODD/CD, ADHD, followed by an anxiety disorder. In this context, this raises the issue whether DMDD is a unique construct or whether the symptomology for DMDD can be better explained as a specifier for ODD/CD and ADHD. Unlike DMDD, MDEC clearly specifies that the label should only be used if emotional and conduct disorders co-exist.
机译:重要的是要理解新的精神病理学分类中的新诊断实体,如精神障碍-5(DSM-5)(代码F34.8)构建破坏性情绪失调障碍(DMDD)并将其与可能进行比较其他分类系统中的等效障碍,例如疾病-1-10(ICD-10)的国际分类,其具有超微似乎相似的类别,即情绪和行为的混合紊乱(MDEC)(代码F92)。在这项研究中,美国国家心理健康研究所(NIMH)的英国(英国)ARM(UK-LAMS)支持纵向评估躁狂症(LAMS)多网站研究用于评估和回顾性地构建DMDD和MDEC诊断为了比较它们并理解他们共同发生的条件,以改善临床理解。特别是,UK-LAMS参与者的现象学(n?=?117)用于确定DMDD是否是DSM-5内的唯一实体。这些研究结果表明,DMDD或MDEC的68名参与者中的24名(35.3%)满足了DMDD和MDEC的诊断标准,表明这些实体含有重叠的特征,特别是与对立缺陷障碍(奇数)/导尿(CD相关的症状) ),注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)/异丙症(HKD)和/或焦虑症。这些数据还表明,符合DMDD标准的大多数参与者也满足了奇数/ CD,ADHD的诊断标准,其次是焦虑症。在此上下文中,这提出了DMDD是唯一的构造或者是否可以更好地解释为奇数/ CD和ADHD的说明书的唯一构建或者是否可以更好地解释为DMDD的症状。与DMDD不同,MDEC清楚地指出,只有在情绪和进行障碍共存时才应使用标签。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号