首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pain : >Pain catastrophizing influences the use and the effectiveness of distraction in schoolchildren.
【24h】

Pain catastrophizing influences the use and the effectiveness of distraction in schoolchildren.

机译:疼痛灾难性影响了学童的使用和分心的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Distraction is an intuitive way of coping with pain and is often used in children's pain treatment programs. However, empirical evidence concerning the effectiveness of distraction is equivocal. One potential explanation might be that distraction does not work for everyone in every situation. In the current series of studies, we examined the role of pain catastrophizing as an influencing factor of distraction effectiveness. In the first study, we investigated the use of pain coping strategies (including distraction) in schoolchildren (N = 828, aged 8-18 years) by means of a questionnaire. Results indicated that children with higher levels of pain catastrophizing reported using less distraction strategies in daily life than children with lower levels of pain catastrophizing. In the second study, a subsample (N = 81, aged 9-18 years) performed a painful cold pressor task (CPT) (12 degrees C). Participants were randomly assigned to a distraction group, in which an attention-demanding tone-detection task was performed during the CPT, or a control group, in which no distraction task was performed. Results showed that participants in the distraction group were engaged in the distraction task, and reported to have paid less attention to pain than participants in the control group. However, distraction was ineffective in reducing cold pressor pain, and even intensified the pain experience in high catastrophizing children. Caution may be warranted in using distraction as a 'one size fits all' method, especially in high catastrophizing children.
机译:分散注意力是一种直观的应对疼痛的方式,通常用于儿童的止痛治疗计划。然而,有关分心的有效性的经验证据是等因素。一个潜在的解释可能是每种情况下都不适合每个人的分心。在目前的一系列研究中,我们检查了疼痛灾难性的作用,作为分散效果的影响因素。在第一项研究中,我们通过调查问卷调查了在学童中使用疼痛应对策略(包括分散注意力)(包括828岁)。结果表明,疼痛较高水平灾害水平较高的儿童在日常生活中使用比疼痛灾害水平较低的儿童在日常生活中使用不那么分心策略。在第二研究中,子样本(n = 81,年龄9-18岁)进行了痛苦的冷压力机任务(CPT)(12摄氏度)。参与者被随机分配给分心组,其中在CPT期间执行注意力调节的音调检测任务,或者对照组进行了不受牵引任务任务的侦测。结果表明,分心小组的参与者从事分心任务,并报告对疼痛的关注,而不是对照组的参与者。然而,在减少寒冷的压力疼痛方面,分散注意力是无效的,甚至加剧了高灾难性儿童的疼痛经验。在使用分心时,可能需要谨慎,因为“一种尺寸适合所有”方法,特别是在高灾难性儿童中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号