...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical pharmacology >Do educational meetings and group detailing change adherence to drug formularies in hospitals? A cluster randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Do educational meetings and group detailing change adherence to drug formularies in hospitals? A cluster randomized controlled trial

机译:教育会议和小组会详细说明在医院的药物状物中更改依从性吗? 群集随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine whether educational meetings and group detailing could increase the use of drugs from the ward lists or the drug formulary in hospitals. Methods: Twelve medical wards from two hospitals were randomized into three groups: control, basic and extended intervention. All wards had a ward list review before interventions. Moreover, the basic intervention consisted of an educational meeting, and the extended intervention included two group detailing sessions. The proportion of drugs used from the ward list or hospital drug formulary (HDF) was the primary outcome. Data (defined daily doses [DDDs], numbers and cost [Euros]) on drugs sold to the wards were retrieved from the two hospitals from 1 July 2011 to 31 August 2012. Baseline data: from July to September 2011, and follow-up data: from June to August 2012. Results: The proportion of formulary drugs used increased for the extended intervention group (0.04, range -0.02 to 0.09) and basic intervention group (0.03, range -0.03 to 0.09) in comparison with a decrease in the control group (-0.01, range -0.03 to -0.02). The interventions did not significantly change odds for selecting drugs from the formulary in comparison with the control group (basic intervention: OR 1.09 [95 % CI 0.81 to 1.46]; extended intervention: OR 1.00 [95 % CI 0.75 to 1.35]). Conclusions: In this study, educational meetings and group detailing do not significantly improve adherence to ward lists or HDF. The adherence to the formularies at baseline was relatively high, which may explain why the interventions did not have a significant effect.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是审查教育会议和团体细节是否可以增加来自病房名单或医院药物美容的药物的使用。方法:来自两家医院的12个医学病房随机分为三组:控制,基本和延长干预。所有病房在干预措施之前都有病房清单审查。此外,基本干预由教育会议组成,延长干预包括两组细节会议。来自病房名单或医院药物制质性(HDF)的药物的比例是主要的结果。从2011年7月1日至2012年8月31日的两家医院检索到病房的药物上的数据(定义日常剂量[DDDS],数字和成本[欧元])。基线数据:2011年7月至9月,和随访数据:从6月到2012年8月。结果:延长干预组(0.04,范围为-0.02至0.09)和基本干预组(0.03,范围-0.03至0.09)增加的正方形药物的比例相比减少对照组(-0.01,范围-0.03至-0.02)。与对照组(基本干预:或1.09 [95%CI 0.81至1.46]的比较,干预措施没有显着改变来自所述正方形药物的药物;延长干预:或1.00 [95%CI 0.75至1.35])。结论:在这项研究中,教育会议和小组细节不会显着改善对病房名单或HDF的依从性。在基线上依从素质相对较高,这可以解释为什么干预措施没有显着影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号