首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >Diagnostic performance of two molecular assays for the detection of vaginitis in symptomatic women
【24h】

Diagnostic performance of two molecular assays for the detection of vaginitis in symptomatic women

机译:两种分子测定对症状性阴道炎检测的诊断性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The three main causes of vaginitis are bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomoniasis (TV). Two multiplex assays are commercially available for detection of DNA from organisms associated with vaginitis: BD Affirm (TM) VPIII Microbial Identification Test (Affirm) and BD MAX (TM) Vaginal Panel (MAX VP). Here, the performance of MAX VP was compared to that of Affirm, which was considered the standard of care. Four vaginal swabs were collected from each subject with the following: BD Affirm (TM) VPIII Ambient Temperature Transport System (ATTS), BD MAX (TM) UVE Specimen Collection Kit, Hologic Aptima (R) Vaginal Swab Specimen Collection Kit, and BD ESwab (TM) collection and transport system (ESwab). Candida culture, Gram stain followed by Nugent scoring, and the Hologic Aptima (R) Trichomonas vaginalis assay were used for discordant analysis. Results were considered true positive if there were at least two tests positive for any vaginitis target. A total of 200 symptomatic women were evaluated in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of MAX VP for BV was 96.2% and 96.1%, respectively, compared to 96.2% and 81.6% for Affirm. The sensitivity and specificity of MAX VP for Candida spp. was 98.4% and 95.4%, respectively, compared to 69.4% and 100% for Affirm. MAX VP and Affirm showed 100% concordance for detection of TV. These results demonstrate improved accuracy of MAX VP compared to Affirm for the detection of BV and Candida spp. and no difference for detection of TV between the two tests.
机译:阴道炎的三个主要原因是细菌性阴道病(BV),外阴阴道念珠菌病(VVC)和滴虫病(TV)。两种多重测定可商购可用于检测与阴道炎相关的生物体的DNA:BD肯定(TM)VPIII微生物鉴定试验(肯定)和BD MAX(TM)阴道板(MAX VP)。在这里,将MAX VP的性能与确认的性能进行了比较,被认为是护理标准。从每个受试者收集四个阴道拭子:BD肯定(TM)VPIII环境温度传输系统(ATT),BD MAX(TM)uve样本收集试剂盒,HOLOMIC APTIMA(R)阴道拭子样本收集套件,以及BD ESWAB (TM)收集和运输系统(ESWAB)。念珠菌文化,克染色,随后是苦难的评分,HOLOGICAPTIMA(R)richomonas阴道分析用于不和谐分析。如果对任何阴道炎目标至少有两种测试,结果被认为是真正的阳性。该研究中共有200名症状妇女。 MAX VP对BV的敏感性和特异性分别为96.2%和96.1%,而确认为96.2%和81.6%。 MAX VP对念珠菌SPP的敏感性和特异性。分别为98.4%和95.4%,相比肯定为69.4%和100%。 Max VP和肯定表明检测电视100%的一致性。这些结果表明,与肯定对BV和Candida SPP的肯定相比,MAX VP的准确性提高。在两个测试之间检测电视没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号