...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >Secular trends in the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia: a comparison between three prospective cohorts
【24h】

Secular trends in the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia: a comparison between three prospective cohorts

机译:菌血症患者经验抗生素治疗的拟合的世俗趋势:三个潜在队列之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to explore whether the percentage of inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia changed over time and to understand the factors that brought on the change. Three prospective cohorts of patients with bacteremia in three different periods (January 1st, 1988 to December 31st, 1989; May 1st, 2004 to November 30, 2004; May 1st, 2010 to April 30, 2011) were compared. Analysis was performed on a total of 811 patients. In 2010-2011, 55.9% (76/136) of patients with bacteremia received inappropriate empirical treatment, compared with 34.5% (170/493) and 33.5% (55/164) in the first and second periods, respectively, in a significant upward trend (p = 0.001). Resistance to antibiotics increased significantly during the study period. The following variables were included in the multivariate analysis assessing risk factors for inappropriate empirical treatment: study period (third period) [odds ratio, OR = 2.766 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.655-4.625)], gender (male) [OR = 1.511 (1.014-2.253)], pathogen carrying extended-spectrum beta-lactamases [OR = 10.426 (4.688-23.187)], multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [OR = 5.428 (2.181-13.513)], and skin/soft infections [OR = 3.23 (1.148-9.084)]. A model excluding microbiological data included: gender (male) [OR = 1.648 (1.216-2.234)], study period (third period) [OR = 2.446 (1.653-3.620)], hospital-acquired infection [OR = 1.551 (1.060-2.270)], previous use of antibiotics [OR = 1.815 (1.247-2.642)], bedridden patient [OR = 2.019 (1.114-3.658)], and diabetes mellitus [OR = 1.620 (1.154-2.274)]. We have observed a worrisome increase in the rate of inappropriate empirical treatment of bacteremia. We need tools that will allow us better prediction of the pathogen and its susceptibilities during the first hours of managing a patient suspected of a severe bacterial infection.
机译:本研究的目的是探讨菌血症患者的不适当经验抗生素治疗的百分比是否随着时间的推移而变化,并了解改变的因素。三个不同时期菌血症患者的三个前瞻性队列(1988年1月1日至1989年12月31日; 2004年5月1日至2004年11月30日; 2010年5月1日至2011年4月30日)。分析总共进行811名患者。 2010 - 2011年,55.9%(76/136)患者的菌血症接受不适当的经验治疗,与34.5%(170/493)和33.5%(55/164)分别在第一和第二期中有重大向上趋势(p = 0.001)。在研究期间,对抗生素的抗性显着增加。多变量包括在多变量分析中,评估不适当的经验治疗的风险因素:研究期(第三期)[odds比率,或= 2.766(95%置信区间,CI,1.655-4.625)],性别(男性)[或= 1.511(1.014-253)],携带扩展谱β-内酰胺酶的病原体[或= 10.426(4.688-23.187)],多药物抗性肺杆菌(4.688-23.187),抗性抗杆菌[或= 5.428(2.181-13.513)]和皮肤/软感染[或= 3.23(1.148-9.084)]。包括微生物数据的模型包括:性别(男性)[或= 1.648(1.216-2.234)],研究期(第三期)[或= 2.446(1.653-3.620)],医院获得的感染[或= 1.551(1.060- 2.270)]以前使用抗生素[或= 1.815(1.247-2.642)],卧床不起患者[或= 2.019(1.114-3.658)]和糖尿病[或= 1.620(1.154-2.274)]。我们观察到令人担忧的增加,以不适当的菌血症的经验治疗的速度增加。我们需要工具,使我们能够在管理疑似严重细菌感染的患者的第一小时内更好地预测病原体及其敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号