...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Ultrasound-assisted vs. landmark-guided paramedian spinal anaesthesia in the elderly A randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Ultrasound-assisted vs. landmark-guided paramedian spinal anaesthesia in the elderly A randomised controlled trial

机译:超声波辅助与地标引导的Paramedian脊髓麻醉在老年人的随机对照试验中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND Neuraxial ultrasound might improve the efficacy of spinal anaesthesia but this has not been tested for the paramedian approach in the elderly. OBJECTIVE The current study aims to assess whether the ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique can decrease the number of needle passes required for success compared with the landmark-guided paramedian technique in the elderly. DESIGN Randomised controlled study. SETTING Single-institution, tertiary-level hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea from October 2017 to January 2018. PATIENTS Eighty patients aged at least 60 years undergoing orthopaedic surgery. INTERVENTION All received paramedian spinal anaesthesia by either the landmark-guided or preprocedural ultrasound-assisted technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The number of needle passes required for successful dural puncture. RESULTS The number of needle passes (median [interquartile range]) was significantly lower (1.0 [1.0 to 2.0] vs. 4.5 [2.0 to 7.0]) and the success rate at first pass significantly higher at 65.0 vs. 17.5% in the ultrasound compared with the landmark group (both P < 0.001). The ultrasound-assisted technique required a longer time for establishing landmarks (117.5 s [85.5 to 150.7 s] vs. 17.5 s [14.0 to 23.0 s]) and for total procedure (181.5 s [133.5 to 212.5 s] vs. 92.5 s [62.5 to 176.5 s]) but a shorter time for administering spinal anaesthesia (39.5 s [31.5 to 71.3 s] vs. 77.0 s [45.8 to 136.5 s]; all, P < 0.001) than the palpation-guided technique. The ultrasound group showed lower periprocedural pain scores (3 [2 to 4] vs. 4 [4 to 6]; P = 0.009) and discomfort scores (2 [0 to 3] vs. 5 [2 to 6]; P = 0.003) than the landmark group. CONCLUSION Compared with the landmark-guided paramedian technique, the ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique decreases the number of needle manipulations and periprocedural pain and discomfort scores in the elderly. Our results suggest that neuraxial ultrasonography facilitates the performance of spinal anaesthesia in the elderly.
机译:背景技术神经轴超声可能会改善脊髓麻醉的功效,但这尚未在老年人在老年人的方法中进行测试。目的目前的研究旨在评估超声辅助的护理体技术是否可以减少成功所需的针头数量,与老年人的地标引导的护理技术相比。设计随机对照研究。从2017年10月到2018年1月,韩国共和国首尔制定单机构三级医院。患者八十名患者年龄在骨科手术中至少60年。通过地标引导或预先开发的超声辅助技术进行干预所有接受的护理人员脊髓麻醉。主要结果测量成功白云刺穿所需的针通行证数量。结果针通行量(中位数[四分位数])显着较低(1.0 [1.0至2.0]与4.5 [2.0至7.0]),首次通过的成功率在超声中的65.0与17.5%显着更高。与地标组(P <0.001)相比。超声辅助技术需要更长的时间来建立地标(117.5秒[85.5至150.7 s]与17.5 s [14.0至23.0 s])和总程序(181.5秒[133.5至212.5 s]与92.5 s [ 62.5至176.5 s]),但施用脊髓麻醉的时间较短(39.5秒[31.5至71.3 s],77.0 s [45.8至136.5 s];全部,p <0.001)比触诊引导技术。超声组显示较低的脉冲疼痛评分(3 [2至4]与4 [4至6]; p = 0.009)和不适(2 [0至3]与5 [2至6]; p = 0.003 )比地标集团多。结论与地标引导的主题技术相比,超声辅助的主题技术降低了老年人针织和人群疼痛和不适分数的数量。我们的研究结果表明,神经内超声检查促进了老年人脊髓麻醉的表现。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Seoul Natl Univ Seoul Natl Univ Hosp Dept Anesthesiol &

    Pain Med Coll Med 101 Daehak Ro Seoul;

    Seoul Natl Univ Seoul Natl Univ Hosp Dept Anesthesiol &

    Pain Med Coll Med 101 Daehak Ro Seoul;

    Seoul Natl Univ Seoul Natl Univ Hosp Dept Anesthesiol &

    Pain Med Coll Med 101 Daehak Ro Seoul;

    Seoul Natl Univ Seoul Natl Univ Hosp Dept Anesthesiol &

    Pain Med Coll Med 101 Daehak Ro Seoul;

    Seoul Natl Univ Seoul Natl Univ Hosp Dept Anesthesiol &

    Pain Med Coll Med 101 Daehak Ro Seoul;

    Seoul Natl Univ Seoul Natl Univ Hosp Dept Anesthesiol &

    Pain Med Coll Med 101 Daehak Ro Seoul;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 麻醉学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号