Paucity of evidence for the effectiveness of prophylactic low-dose oxytocin protocols (5 IU) compared with 5 IU in women undergoing elective caesarean section A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Terblanche Nico C. S.; Picone Dean S.; Otahal Petr; Sharman James E.

首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Paucity of evidence for the effectiveness of prophylactic low-dose oxytocin protocols (5 IU) compared with 5 IU in women undergoing elective caesarean section A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

【24h】

Paucity of evidence for the effectiveness of prophylactic low-dose oxytocin protocols (5 IU) compared with 5 IU in women undergoing elective caesarean section A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

机译：预防性低剂量催产素方案（＆LT; 5IU）有效性的缺乏与接受选修剖腹产的女性妇女的5IU，对随机对照试验进行了系统审查

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

机译：文本中提供了补充数字内容

著录项

来源
《European journal of anaesthesiology》 |2018年第12期|共3页
作者
Terblanche Nico C. S.; Picone Dean S.; Otahal Petr; Sharman James E.;
展开▼
作者单位

Royal Hobart Hosp Dept Anaesthesia &

Perioperat Med 48 Liverpool St Hobart Tas 7001 Australia;

Univ Tasmania Menzies Inst Med Res Blood Pressure Res Grp Hobart Tas Australia;

Univ Tasmania Stat Grp Hobart Tas Australia;

Univ Tasmania Menzies Inst Med Res Blood Pressure Res Grp Hobart Tas Australia;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类麻醉学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献

1. Paucity of evidence for the effectiveness of prophylactic low-dose oxytocin protocols (5 IU) compared with 5 IU in women undergoing elective caesarean section A systematic review of randomised controlled trials [J] . Terblanche Nico C. S., Picone Dean S., Otahal Petr, European journal of anaesthesiology . 2018,第12期

机译：预防性低剂量催产素方案（＆LT; 5IU）有效性的缺乏与接受选修剖腹产的女性妇女的5IU，对随机对照试验进行了系统审查
2. A randomised controlled trial of oxytocin 5IU and placebo infusion versus oxytocin 5IU and 30IU infusion for the control of blood loss at elective caesarean section--pilot study. ISRCTN 40302163. [J] . Murphy DJ, MacGregor H, Munishankar B, European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: An International Journal . 2009,第1期

机译：催产素5IU和安慰剂输注与催产素5IU和30IU输注控制选择性剖宫产术失血的随机对照试验-试验研究。 ISRCTN 40302163。
3. Effects of 5 IU oxytocin bolus and 20 IU oxytocin infusion compared to 5 IU oxytocin bolus and normal saline infusion in the control of blood loss during and after ante-partum lower segment caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial [J] . J Kajendran, G R C Silva, S K Ranaraja Ceylon Medical Journal . 2017,第3期

机译：5 IU催产素推注和20 IU催产素输注与5 IU催产素推注和生理盐水输注相比对控制产前下节剖腹产前后出血的控制效果：一项随机对照试验
4. Carbetocin Versus Oxytocin: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials for the Future of Maternal Morbidity & Mortality in the US [D] . Howard, Jes'Terieuz J. 2018

机译：Carbetocin与催产素：对美国孕产妇发病和死亡的未来进行的随机对照试验的系统评价
5. Paucity of evidence for the effectiveness of prophylactic low-dose oxytocin protocols (5 IU) compared with 5 IU in women undergoing elective caesarean section [O] . Nico C.S. Terblanche, Dean S. Picone, Petr Otahal, -1

机译：在接受选择性剖宫产的妇女中预防性低剂量催产素方案（5 IU）与5 IU相比的有效性的证据不足
6. Study protocol. ECSSIT - Elective Caesarean Section Syntocinon Infusion Trial. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of oxytocin (Syntocinon) 5 IU bolus and placebo infusion versus oxytocin 5 IU bolus and 40 IU infusion for the control of blood loss at elective caesarean section. [O] . Murphy, Deirdre J, Carey, Michael, Montgomery, Alan A, 2012

机译：研究方案。 ECSSIT-选择性剖宫产Syncincinon输液试验。催产素（Syntocinon）5 IU推注和安慰剂输注与催产素5 IU推注和40 IU输注控制选择性剖宫产术失血的多中心随机对照试验。

Paucity of evidence for the effectiveness of prophylactic low-dose oxytocin protocols (5 IU) compared with 5 IU in women undergoing elective caesarean section A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅