...
首页> 外文期刊>European Economic Review >Collusion and bargaining in asymmetric Cournot duopoly-An experiment
【24h】

Collusion and bargaining in asymmetric Cournot duopoly-An experiment

机译:非对称Cournot Duoply-A实验中的勾结和讨价还价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In asymmetric dilemma games without side payments, players face involved cooperation and bargaining problems. The maximization of joint profits is implausible, players disagree on the collusive action, and the outcome is often inefficient. For the example of a Cournot duopoly with asymmetric cost, we investigate experimentally how players cooperate (collude implicitly and explicitly), if at all, in such games. In our treatments without communication, players fail to cooperate and essentially play the static Nash equilibrium (consistent with previous results). With communication, inefficient firms gain at the expense of efficient ones. When the role of the efficient firm is earned in a contest, the efficient firm earns higher profits than when this role is randomly allocated. Bargaining solutions do not satisfactorily predict outcomes. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在没有副款的不对称困境游戏中,球员面临的涉及合作和讨价还价的问题。 联合利润的最大化是难以置信的,球员不同意契合行动,结果往往效率低下。 对于具有不对称成本的法庭二极管的例子,我们通过实验调查了玩家如何合作(隐含地和明确地勾结),如果一切都在这样的游戏中。 在没有沟通的治疗中,玩家未能合作,基本上扮演静态纳什均衡(与先前的结果一致)。 通过沟通,效率低下的公司以牺牲有效的公司获得。 当在比赛中获得高效公司的作用时,有效的公司的利润率高于随机分配的作用。 讨价还价的解决方案并不令人满意地预测结果。 (c)2018 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号