...
首页> 外文期刊>Ethology >Is exploration a metric for information gathering? Attraction to novelty and plasticity in black-capped chickadees
【24h】

Is exploration a metric for information gathering? Attraction to novelty and plasticity in black-capped chickadees

机译:探索收集信息的指标吗? 黑色山雀的新奇和可塑性的吸引力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Animals can learn about the value of resources and predation risk by exploring novel environments or exploring novel stimuli in their regular environments. Still, there is a disconnect in the way that exploration has been defined and measured; exploration is defined in terms of information acquisition, while measured in terms of movement speed and diversity of contacted items in a novel environment. If exploration is indeed a measurement of information gathering, fast explorers should seek to reduce uncertainty about their environment more than slow explorers. Exploration speed has also been linked to behavioral plasticity, where fast explorers move fast but collect less detailed information, thereby forming routines and expressing less plasticity than slow explorers. We test these two hypotheses by comparing exploration in a novel environment to individuals' attraction to novelty and behavioral plasticity. Our results support the view that exploration is a measurement of information-gathering tendencies as fast explorers were more likely to collect novel information, which should reduce uncertainty further than sampling familiar information sources, compared with slower explorers. Furthermore, faster explorers switched to sampling novel information more quickly than slow explorers when the value of the familiar option decreased, opposing the widely held view that faster explorers present more routine-like behavior. By providing familiar and novel foraging options in close spatial contiguity, we demonstrate an attraction to novelty in faster explorers that cannot be confounded by activity rate, thereby suggesting that these individuals seek to reduce uncertainty. In conclusion, our results support the biological validity of the term "exploration" through its association with information gathering.
机译:动物可以通过探索新颖的环境或在常规环境中探索新颖的刺激来了解资源和捕食风险的价值。尽管如此,探索已经定义和测量的方式存在脱节;探索是在信息收购方面定义的,而在新环境中的接触项目的移动速度和多样性方面衡量。如果探索确实是信息收集的衡量,快速探险家应该寻求减少对他们环境的不确定性,而不是慢探险家。勘探速度也与行为可塑性有关,快速探险者快速移动,但收集更少的详细信息,从而形成常规,表达比慢探险者更少的可塑性。我们通过比较新的环境中的探索来测试这两个假设,以使个人吸引力为新颖性和行为可塑性。我们的业绩支持探索是探索信息收集趋势,因为快速探险者更有可能收集新颖的信息,这与较慢的探险者相比,这应该减少不确定的不确定性。此外,当熟悉选项的价值减少时,更快的探险者比慢探险者更快地切换到采样新颖信息,相反,普遍认为,更快的探险者展示了更多的例行样行为。通过在近距离空间邻接中提供熟悉的和新颖的觅食选项,我们展示了在更快的探险者中对新颖性的吸引力,这些探险者不能被活动率混淆,从而建议这些人寻求减少不确定性。总之,我们的业绩通过与信息收集的关系支持“探索”一词的生物学有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号