...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Ecology >Development of Minimum Soil and Plant Data Set for DSSAT Crop Simulation Model for Pigeonpea Cultivars under Varied Dates of Sowing
【24h】

Development of Minimum Soil and Plant Data Set for DSSAT Crop Simulation Model for Pigeonpea Cultivars under Varied Dates of Sowing

机译:播种日期下鸽皮品种DSSAT作物仿真模型的最低土壤和植物数据集

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Traditional agronomic experiments conducted at particular points in time and space are site, season specific and time consuming. To overcome this, many computer based software have been developed called as Crop Simulation Models. Among the numerous crop growth models, the most widely used is the Decision Support for Agro Technology Transfer (DSSAT) model, which is designed to simulate growth, development, and yield of a crop along with changes in soil water, carbon and nitrogen under the system overtime. An attempt was made to developminimum data set for two pigeonpea cultivars (BRG-1 and BRG-2) from the observations recorded by conducting an experiment at UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru during 2017-18 and 2018-19. The results of 2018 revealed that the model underestimated the yields under thecrop sown during 30thMay (-108.4%) and overestimated the yields under the crop sown during 10 and 24th August (54.2% and 15.1%, respectively). Among the two varieties, model overestimated the yields for BRG-1 (3.7%) compared to BRG-2 (-29.8%). During 2018-19, model underestimated the yield for 10* May and 1 s,June sown crop (-41.0% and -74.9%, respectively) as compared crop sown on 12,h July (250.7%). Among the two varieties, BRG-2 recorded lower error (1.6%) as compared to BRG-1 (88.3%). Statistical evaluation of experimental yield using mean error (ME), root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of residual mass (CRM) and modelling efficiency (EF) revealed that, simulation of BRG-1 grain yield was in good agreement with the observed values with comparatively low ME (3.6 and 46.0 during 2017-18 and 2018-19, respectively) indicating the variety is calibrated well among the two varieties. Minimum average RMSE (3511.2) values were recorded indicating less deviation of simulated values from observed values. Positive CRM (0.048) values were recorded indicating underestimation of yields by the model, requiring some more calibration by field experimentation.
机译:特定时间和空间的传统农艺实验是现场,季节特定和耗时。为了克服这一点,已经开发了许多基于计算机的软件,称为作物仿真模型。在众多作物生长模型中,最广泛使用的是Agro技术转移(DSSAT)模型的决策支持,该模型旨在模拟作物的生长,开发和产量以及土壤水,碳和氮的变化系统加班。尝试从2017-18和2018-19期间在UAS,GKVK,班加罗尔术中进行实验,从2017-18和2018-19期间进行实验,为两只鸽皮品种(BRG-1和BRG-2)产生的数据集。 2018年的结果表明,该模型在30日(-108.4%)期间低估了饲养剧本的产量,并高估了8月10日和24日播种的作物的产量(分别为54.2%和15.1%)。在两个品种中,与BRG-2(-29.8%)相比,模型高估了BRG-1(3.7%)的产率。在2018 - 199年期间,模型低估了10 * 5月和1月,6月播种作物(分别为-41.0%和-74.9%的产量,以便在7月12日播种的比较(250.7%)。在两个品种中,与BRG-1(88.3%)相比,BRG-2记录较低的误差(1.6%)。使用平均误差(ME),均方根误差(RMSE),残留量(CRM)系数和建模效率(EF)的统计评估显示,BRG-1谷物产量的模拟与观察到的吻合良好具有比较低的值(分别为2017-18和2018-19期间的3.6和46.0)表明该品种在两种品种中均匀校准。记录最小平均RMSE(3511.2)值表示从观察到的值的模拟值的较少偏差。记录阳性CRM(0.048)值表明通过模型低估产量,需要通过现场实验更多的校准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号