...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Ecology >Effect of Moisture Stress Management Practices and Irrigation Regimes on Yield and Physiology of Maize (Zea mays L.)
【24h】

Effect of Moisture Stress Management Practices and Irrigation Regimes on Yield and Physiology of Maize (Zea mays L.)

机译:水分压力管理实践与灌溉制度对玉米产量和生理学的影响(Zea Mays L.)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2017 and 2018 to study the influence of moisture stress management practices on plant physiology and yield of maize. Study revealed that, irrigation scheduling at IW/CPE ratio of 1.0 produced significantly higher relative leaf water content (80.1%), transpiration rate (4.31 mmol nrV) stomatal conductance (0.304 mmol nrV) and was followed by IW/CPE ratio of 0.8. while, lower values were recorded in IW/CPE of 0.4. In terms of yield and net photosynthetic rate IW/CPE ratio of 1.0 out performed with 7,188 kg haH and 44.4 umol irrV respectively which was comparable with IW/CPE ratio of 0.8 (7,142 kg ha~(-1), umol nrV). Among the foliar application of treatments PPFM @ 1% recorded significantly higher relative leaf water content (73.7%), transpiration rate (3.97 mmol m~V) stomatol conductance (0.287 mmol nrV1) and net photosynthetic rate (40.2 umol nrV) followed by silicic acid @ 0.2%. Foliar application of PPFM @ 1% and silicic acid 0.2% producedsignificantly higher and comparable yield (6,847 and 6,600 kg ha~(-1)). From the study, irrigation at IW/CPE ratio of 0.8 realized a net return of Rs 63,960 with B : C ratio of 3.11. Similarly, PPEM @ 1% attained a net return of Rs 60, 923 with B : C ratio of 3.02. On comparison with water productivity, IW/CPE ratio of 0.6 noted Rs 257 ha~(-1) mm~(-1) of water applied to the crop. Likewise Rs 248 ha~(-1) mm~(-1) was realized with the application of PPFM @ 1%. Irrigation at IW/CPE ratio of 0.8 along withfoliar application of PPFM @ 1 % enhanced the production and profit in comparison with other treatments.
机译:2017年至2018年的Rabi季节进行了现场实验,研究了水分压力管理实践对植物生理学和玉米产量的影响。研究表明,在IW / CPE比为1.0的IW / CPE比的灌溉调度显着更高的相对叶含水量(80.1%),蒸腾速率(4.31mmol NRV)气孔导率(0.304mmol NRV),然后是IW / CPE比为0.8。虽然,较低的值在0.4的IW / CPE中记录。就产量和净光合速​​率IW / CPE比例为1.0 out,分别进行了7,188千克HAH和44.4UMOL IRRV,其与IW / CPE比为0.8(7,142kg HA〜(-1),UMOL NRV)相当。在治疗的叶面施用中,PPFM @ 1%的相对叶含水量(73.7%),蒸腾率(3.97mmol m〜v)气孔电导(0.287mmol nrv1)和净光合速​​率(40.2 umol nrv)之后的液体酸@ 0.2%。叶面施用PPFM @ 1%和硅酸0.2%制备的冠状动脉均匀,产量相当(6,847和6,600千克HA〜(-1))。从研究来看,IW / CPE比率的灌溉为0.8,实现了63,960卢比的净返回,B:C比率为3.11。同样,PPEM @ 1%达到了RS 60,923的净返回,B:C比率为3.02。与水生产率的比较,IW / CPE比率为0.6令拍摄的0.6卢比的Rs 257 Ha〜(-1)mm〜(-1)水。同样,通过PPFM @ 1%的应用来实现RS 248 HA〜(-1)mm〜(-1)。 IW / CPE比率灌溉0.8次沿含量施用PPFM @ 1%的施用增强了与其他治疗相比的生产和利润。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号