首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science & policy >Understanding the science-policy interface: Case studies on the role of information in fisheries management
【24h】

Understanding the science-policy interface: Case studies on the role of information in fisheries management

机译:了解科学政策界面:案例研究信息在渔业管理中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Case studies of the Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO), and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) highlighted factors influencing scientific communication that are contingent on the characteristics of the many dynamic and iterative science-policy interfaces among decision-makers, scientists, and other stakeholders. Direct observations of 15 scientific and management meetings coupled with interviews with 78 scientists and managers revealed aspects of the information pathways, i.e., production, communication, and use of scientific information in these organizations. Unique features of decision making and information use enable the production of credible, relevant, and legitimate information in each organization, including trade-offs in these attributes to support fisheries governance objectives. For instance, defined processes for producing scientific advice embedded in fisheries management authorities, such as DFO and NAFO, ensure uptake of information in decision-making. As a boundary organization, FAO bridges science and policy-making groups among its member countries. The demand for scientific advice, policy development, and trade aspects are primary drivers in the information pathways. However, organizational aspects such as dispersed units and inadequate communication persist as barriers to information flow. Across the geographic scales of the three organizations, stakeholders apart from government scientists and policy-makers, e.g., the fishing industry, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the public, are increasingly involved in the information pathways. Insights about the information pathways can equip the organizations to evaluate or modify practices to increase the uptake of information in decision-making as fisheries management issues and considerations become more complex. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:加拿大渔业和海洋部(DFO),西北大西洋渔业组织(NAFO)的案例研究,以及联合国的粮食和农业组织(粮农组织)突出了影响科学沟通的因素,这些因素取决于许多动态的特征决策者,科学家和其他利益攸关方之间的迭代科学政策界面。与78名科学家和管理人员的访谈相加的15个科学和管理会议的直接观察揭示了这些组织中的信息途径,即生产,沟通和使用科学信息的方面。决策和信息使用的独特功能使得能够在每个组织中生产可信,相关和合法的信息,包括这些属性的权衡,以支持渔业治理目标。例如,嵌入在渔业管理机构(如DFO和NAFO)中嵌入科学建议的定义流程确保了在决策中采取信息。作为一个边界组织,粮农组织桥梁在其成员国之间的科学和政策制作群体。对科学咨询,政策制定和交易方面的需求是信息途径中的主要驱动因素。然而,诸如分散单位和不充分的通信不足的组织方面持续存在于信息流的障碍。在三个组织的地理尺度上,利益相关者除了政府科学家和政策制定者之外,例如渔业,非政府组织(非政府组织)和公众越来越多地参与信息途径。关于信息途径的见解可以通过组织来评估或修改实践,以增加决策中的信息的采伐,因为渔业管理问题和考虑因素变得更加复杂。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号