Is it wise to compromise renewable energy future for the sake of expediency? An analysis of Pakistan's long-term electricity generation pathways
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Strategy Reviews >Is it wise to compromise renewable energy future for the sake of expediency? An analysis of Pakistan's long-term electricity generation pathways
【24h】

Is it wise to compromise renewable energy future for the sake of expediency? An analysis of Pakistan's long-term electricity generation pathways

机译:为了权宜之计,它是否明智地妥协可再生能源未来? 巴基斯坦长期发电途径分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Pakistan's acute energy crisis has critically affected its already fragile economy, costing in recent years up to 4% it's of Gross Domestic Product. Political expediency in the wake of the current power crisis in Pakistan together with the current high investment costs of renewable energy technologies have shifted focus of the policy to thermal power plants in the short run to meet the deficit. This paper presents a long-term view of the current power policy and forecasts electricity demand in Pakistan in the long run congruent with anticipated strong economic growth, as envisaged in 'Pakistan Vision 2025', its medium-term development framework. Using Long Range Energy Alternatives Planning (LEAP), a bottom-up scenario modelling framework, different electricity generation scenarios are developed to meet an estimated annual requirement of 303.7 terawatt-hours (TWh) by 2035. Government policy (GP) scenario models the current economic and power policy, while Renewable Energy (REN) and Demand Side Management (DSM) scenarios provide alternative power generation pathways. These scenarios are compared based on net present cost (NPC) at different discount rates (5%, 7% and 10%). Interestingly, the REN scenario with a 35% share of solar PV and wind power turns out to be economically more viable than GP and DSM scenarios saving $26 billion and $17 billion in NPC respectively, due to sizeable savings on imported fuels. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with all three scenarios over the study period are also estimated, whereby the RE scenario appears to save over 221 MtCO2 and 159 MtCO2 more emissions compared to GP and DSM scenarios. The results of the least cost scenario are also analysed to depict falling investment and installation costs of renewable energy technologies making them more profitable as a long run energy security option for Pakistan. Policy implications in the light of the study are discussed. Highlights ? Electricity demand in Pakistan is forecast to increase by 6.1% annually till 2035. ? Three different electricity generation expansion scenarios are analyzed in Pakistan's power system model. ? Renewable energy scenario to meet growing electricity demand is feasible as compared to government policy and demand-side management scenarios. ? Projected decline in capital costs and enormous potential of renewable energy make it a prudent alternative to current government policy. <
机译:<![CDATA [ 抽象 巴基斯坦的急救能源危机对其已经脆弱的经济危重影响了它,近年来的成本达到了4%,这是粗略的4%国内产品。政治权宜之计在巴基斯坦当前的电力危机之后,随着可再生能源技术的目前的高投资成本,在短期内将政策的重点转移到热电厂以满足赤字。本文介绍了目前的权力政策,并在长期的经济增长中长期经营一致,在“巴基斯坦愿景2025”,中期发展框架中设想,预计一直存​​在电力政策,预测巴基斯坦的电力需求。使用远程能源替代品规划(LEAP),自下而上的情景建模框架,开发了不同的发电场景,以满足2035年的估计年要求303.7特拉瓦(TWH)。政府政策(GP)场景模型模型经济和权力政策,而可再生能源(REN)和需求侧管理(DSM)情景提供替代发电路径。这些方案基于不同折扣率的净目前(NPC)进行比较(5%,7%和10%)。有趣的是,由于在进口燃料的大幅度储蓄,在太阳能光伏和风电量份额的35%的太阳能光伏和风电量份额的份额分别比GP和DSM情景分别在高中保存260亿美元和170亿美元。还估计了与研究期间所有三种情景相关的温室气体(GHG)排放,从而似乎与GP和DSM情景相比,RE方案似乎节省了221 MTCO2和159 MTCO2更多的排放。还分析了最低成本场景的结果,以描述可再生能源技术的投资和安装成本,使其更有利可图,作为巴基斯坦的长期能源安全选择。讨论了策略影响。 突出显示 巴基斯坦的电力需求预测每年增加6.1%,直到2035年。 在巴基斯坦电力系统模型中分析了三种不同的发电扩展方案。 可再生能源方案以满足越来越多的电力与政府政策和需求方管理方案相比是可行的。 资本成本的预计下降,可再生能源的巨大潜力使其成为当前政府政策的审慎替代方案。 <

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号