首页> 外文期刊>Earth sciences history: Journal of the History of the Earth Sciences Society >THE IMPORTANCE OF THE MUSEUM IN ANTEBELLUM U.S. WESTERN TERRITORIAL EXPLORATION: UNDERSTANDING THE RELEVANCE OF COLLECTING FOSSILS AND THEIR CONSERVATION TO SOLVING LONG-STANDING GEOLOGIC AND PALEONTOLOGIC PROBLEMS-PART 1
【24h】

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE MUSEUM IN ANTEBELLUM U.S. WESTERN TERRITORIAL EXPLORATION: UNDERSTANDING THE RELEVANCE OF COLLECTING FOSSILS AND THEIR CONSERVATION TO SOLVING LONG-STANDING GEOLOGIC AND PALEONTOLOGIC PROBLEMS-PART 1

机译:博物馆在安排博物馆美国西部领域探索的重要性:了解收集化石的相关性及其保护,以解决长期地质和古学问题 - 第1部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The determination of pivotal moments in the history of a discipline of science can depend on the perspective of the observer. This narrative notes the importance of antebellum institutions in fostering research, research communication, and the potential for fossil conservation. The Smithsonian Institution (U.S. National Museum = National Museum of Natural History) provided a federal umbrella for fossil collection and curation when one was needed. However, along with other institutions, the success record of conserved fossil continental mollusks prior to 1855 is abysmal. Fossils from the first (Frémont in 1843), second (Harris-Audubon in 1843),and third (Evans-Shumard in 1853) expeditions to collect specimens are all now missing. As a clue to the general state of confusion one, terrestrial snail named by Hall and Meek (1855) was misplaced for over a century, but was recently found. Continental molluscan fossils should have served as temporal and environmental landmarks in the construction of geologic maps produced in the 1850s by Hitchcock, Marcou, Rogers, and Hall and Lesley. However, except for the Hall and Lesley map,they did not. Fossil information was published and available, but many fossils were not accessible. The Smithsonian was the recipient of Hayden's fossils and natural science specimens collected in 1854 and 1855. Hayden's fossils and observations resulted in numerous publications, not the least of which were those by Meek and Hayden in 1856 and 1857. For reasons that remain unknown, a number of type specimens (and associated material) used to describe species in 1856 were replaced by Meek in his 1876a monograph, when Meek and Hayden upper Missouri and Yellowstone River species were finally illustrated. Thus, undeclared neotypes have been masquerading as holotypes or members of syntypic (cotypic) series. Meek and Hayden entered the field of western territorial geological studies with only the preconceptions of geology not particularly relevant to what
机译:在科学学科的历史中确定关键时刻可以取决于观察者的角度。这一叙事指出了安排制剂在促进研究,研究沟通和化石保护潜力方面的重要性。史密森机构(美国国家博物馆=国家自然历史博物馆)为化石收集和策划时提供了联邦伞。然而,与其他机构一起,在1855年之前的保守化石大陆软体动物的成功记录是Abysmal。来自第一个(1843年Framont的Fossils),第二(1843年的Harris-Autubon),第三(1853年的埃文斯·桑德)探险队现在缺失。作为一般混乱状态的线索,大厅和温顺(1855年)命名的陆地蜗牛在一个世纪中被放错了,但最近被发现了。大陆软体动物化石应该担任赫克科克,马苏,罗杰斯和大厅和莱斯利的1850年代生产的地质地图中的颞型和环境标志。但是,除了大厅和莱斯利地图,他们没有。化石信息已发布和可用,但许多化石无法访问。史密森尼是在1854年和1855年收集的海登化石和自然科学标本的受援人员.Hayden的化石和观察结果导致了许多出版物,而且最少的是1856年和1857年的温顺和海登的出版物。由于仍然未知的原因用于描述1856年的物种的样本(和相关材料)的数量被MeEk在他的1876年专着的Ineek中所取代,当时最终说明了Meek和Hayden Upper Missouri和黄石河流。因此,未释放的新型材已经伪装成了同步型或同步(Cotypic)系列的成员。米克和海登进入西部地区地质研究领域,只有与地质学的先注看不具体涉及什么

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号