首页> 外文期刊>Ecosystems >Belowground Ecosystem Recovery During Grassland Restoration: South African Highveld Compared to US Tallgrass Prairie
【24h】

Belowground Ecosystem Recovery During Grassland Restoration: South African Highveld Compared to US Tallgrass Prairie

机译:在草原恢复期间地下生态系统恢复:南非高普尔德相比美国Tallgrass草原

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Conversion of cultivated land to grassland is globally practiced to reverse soil degradation, but belowground ecosystem response to restoration has never been compared between old and new world temperate grasslands. We used a chronosequence approach to model change in root biomass and quality (indexed by C:N ratio), microbial biomass and composition [indexed by phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs)], soil aggregate structure, and soil C and N stocks in the South African Highveld and compared recovery of these variables to a grassland restoration chronosequence in the US tallgrass prairie. We hypothesized soil C recovery, and mechanisms promoting soil C and N accrual would be convergent between these distant temperate grasslands with similar growing season precipitation, history of cultivation, and undergoing restoration with C-4-grasses. Total PLFA richness and concentrations of most microbial groups rose to represent uncultivated grassland in the highveld (similar to tallgrass prairie), but in contrast to tallgrass prairie, the fungi:bacteria ratio did not increase with restoration age. In the highveld, root biomass accumulation was lower, but root quality became more representative of the never-cultivated grassland than in restorations in tallgrass prairie. Soil aggregate recovery was slightly faster in tallgrass prairie, and the pattern of macroaggregate C recovery was divergent due to less depletion in cultivated soil and higher stock of C in the uncultivated soil relative to the highveld. More rapid restoration of total soil C and N stocks in the highveld was attributed to greater soil C saturation deficit at the onset of restoration, development of higher quality root systems that promote the microbial biomass and soil aggregation, and climate conditions (distinct periodicity of rainfall and high aridity) that likely impose more limitation to decomposition relative to the tallgrass prairie ecosystem.
机译:将耕地转换为草地,在全球化以逆转土壤退化,但在新旧世界温带草原之间从未比较了恢复的地下生态系统反应。我们使用了一定的时间来改变了根生物量和质量的模型变化(C:n比率,由磷脂脂肪酸(PLFAS),土壤骨料结构和南方的土壤C和N股:南方分析),微生物生物量和组合物非洲高位和将这些变量的回收率与美国Tallgrass草原的草原恢复成分进行了比较。我们假设土壤C恢复,促进土壤C和N应计的机制将在这些遥远的温带草原之间收敛,具有相似的生长季节降水,培养史以及与C-4草进行恢复。总部富普尔(Microbial Group)的总体丰富性和浓度最高,代表了普华永道(类似于Tallgrass Prairie),但与Tallgrass草原相反,真菌:细菌比率没有随恢复时代增加。在高耐期性中,根生物量累积较低,但根本质量变得更加代表从未耕种的草地,而不是在Tallgrass草原的修复过程中。土壤汇总恢复略胜于Tallgrass Prairie,由于植物在未开垦的土壤中相对于高普尔德的植物污垢缺乏而缺乏缺陷,因此宏观冷静恢复的模式具有分歧。在恢复的恢复过程中,促进促进微生物生物量和土壤聚集和气候条件的高质量根系,促进了更高的土壤C饱和度缺陷,归因于更高的土壤C饱和度缺陷造成了更高的土壤C饱和度。(降雨量明显和高干燥的)可能对与Tallgrass草原生态系统相比分解的更加限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号