...
首页> 外文期刊>Economic Policy: A European Forum >Do patents over-compensate innovators?
【24h】

Do patents over-compensate innovators?

机译:专利过度补偿创新者吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

How much patent protection should be accorded inventors and innovators? Is protection too strong or too weak? Over the years,these questions have spawned heated controversies.Machlup and Penrose (1950) vividly recount the nineteenth-century debate that led such countries as Switzerland and the Netherlands to delay the adoption of patent legislation and even to repeal their patent laws for a time.In the 1970s and the 1980s,by contrast,stronger patent protection was widely advocated as a remedy for the productivity slowdown.Now,after more than two decades in which patent protection has been on the rise,economists are increasingly voicing concerns that today patent protection may be excessive.Proposals are again being advanced to weaken patent protection or abolish it outright (e.g.,Boldrin and Levine,2002),explicidy or implicidy arguing that patents substantially over-reward innovators with respect to the socially optimal level.
机译:发明家和创新者应该如何获得多少专利保护? 保护太强或太弱了吗? 多年来,这些问题产生了激烈的争论.Machlup和Penrose(1950)生动地叙述了十九世纪的辩论,导致瑞士和荷兰的国家和荷兰的采用甚至拖延了一段时间的专利法 在20世纪70年代和20世纪80年代,相比之下,更强的专利保护被广泛主张作为生产力减速的补救措施。现在,在二十多年来,专利保护崛起后,经济学家越来越宣传今天的专利 保护可能会过度。重新寻求削弱专利保护或彻底(例如,Boldrin和Levine,2002),透析或隐性争论专利争辩,该专利大幅上涨了奖励创新者,基本上是对社会最佳的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号