首页> 外文期刊>Ecological informatics: an international journal on ecoinformatics and computational ecology >How different are species distribution model predictions?-Application of a new measure of dissimilarity and level of significance to giant panda Ailuropoda melanoleuca
【24h】

How different are species distribution model predictions?-Application of a new measure of dissimilarity and level of significance to giant panda Ailuropoda melanoleuca

机译:物种分布模型预测有多么不同? - 对巨型熊猫无匹配和意义程度的新措施,对巨大的熊猫无匹尔丘莫罗博莫省Melanoleuca采用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Species distribution models (SDMs) are widely used for predicting species spatial distributions. Different model setup and data input however can lead to variable model predictions. Existing studies on quantifying SDM dissimilarity primarily rely on partitioning the variability in SDM-produced community level metrics such as species richness and turnover rate which are threshold-dependent and are generated with binary range maps of multiple species. Most existing measurements of spatial dissimilarity constitute geometric comparisons, which is limited compared to a more information-theoretic application of statistical dissimilarity measures using SDM predictions as direct input without renormalization. We introduce a novel method to quantify the degree of dissimilarity and its level of significance between unscaled SDM predictions of a single species. We apply the method to giant panda Ailuropoda melanoleuca data as well as pairs of simulated species distributions. We utilize a pixel-based Bhattacharyya distance to quantify the degree of dissimilarity among predictions of giant panda habitat of different combinations of model types, Global Climate Models (GCMs) and Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). Comparisons are also made between pairs of simulated species with different degrees of dissimilarity in spatial distribution. To evaluate the level of significance, the observed dissimilarity measure is compared against a null distribution that captures the level of dissimilarity caused by small and random variations. Specific pairs of climate scenarios (HadGEM2-ES with HadGEM2-AO and HadGEM2-AO with MIROC5) consistently produce statistically similar predictions of giant panda habitat; the highest level of RCP tends to result in more similar predictions, suggesting a convergence of model predictions. The simulated scenarios also show that the proposed method is able to effectively differentiate a range of artificial species with varying degree of dissimilarity
机译:物种分布模型(SDMS)广泛用于预测物种空间分布。但是,不同的模型设置和数据输入可能导致可变模型预测。定量SDM异化的现有研究主要依赖于划分SDM制作的群落水平度量的可变性,例如物种丰富性和周转率,其依赖于阈值,并用多种物种的二进制范围映射产生。最现有的空间异化测量构成几何比较,与使用SDM预测的统计化异化措施的更多信息理论应用相比,这是有限的。我们介绍一种新的方法来量化单一物种的未划分的SDM预测之间的异常程度及其显着性水平。我们将该方法应用于巨大的Panda Ailuropoda Melanoleuca数据以及成对的模拟物种分布。我们利用基于像素的BHATTACHARYYA距离来量化模型类型,全球气候模型(GCMS)和代表性浓度途径(RCPS)不同组合的巨大熊猫栖息地的预测程度。还在具有不同程度的空间分布中的模拟物种对之间进行比较。为了评估显着性水平,将观察到的不相似度量与空分布进行比较,以捕获由小和随机变化引起的异化水平。具体的气候情景(Hadgem2-Ao和Hadgem2-Ao的Hadgem2-es与MiroC5)一直在产生统计上类似的巨大熊猫栖息地的预测;最高水平的RCP倾向于导致更类似的预测,表明模型预测的融合。模拟场景还表明,该方法能够有效地区分一系列具有不同程度的不同程度的人造物种

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号