首页> 外文期刊>Ecological restoration >WITHDRAWAL - Administrative Duplicate Publication: 'Women and peace': A human rights strategy for the women, peace and security agenda (Retraction of Vol 35, Pg 210, 2017)
【24h】

WITHDRAWAL - Administrative Duplicate Publication: 'Women and peace': A human rights strategy for the women, peace and security agenda (Retraction of Vol 35, Pg 210, 2017)

机译:撤销 - 行政重复出版物:“妇女与和平”:妇女,和平与安全议程的人权战略(第35卷,PG 210,2017的撤回)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

UN Security Council Resolution 1325 and the successive thematic resolutions together with a variety of reports have shaped the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda. The ensuing policies and institutional responses try to deal with a variety of issues including women's participation in peace-making initiatives and protection from sexual violence during armed conflict and in its aftermath. As such these responses are underpinned by a reactive approach with a focus on conflict and post-conflict gender-sensitive areas of intervention. While these remain worthwhile interventions, the WPS agenda, in spite of its name, inadequately addresses gender-sensitive areas in peace situations, regardless of the existence of conflicts. Building on feminist critiques of the WPS agenda and the findings and recommendations of the 2015 UN Global study on the implementation of Resolution 1325, the article argues that the WSP agenda and its prevention limb need to elaborate and integrate more explicitly and comprehensively a human rights strategy that shifts the focus from a reactive to a proactive model, one which pursues gender equality and women's human rights in its own right, irrespective of whether conflicts erupt or not. A human rights infused WPS preventive agenda should be premised, on the one hand, on a clear understanding and endorsement of the meaning of gender equality, on the other hand, on the creation of mechanisms and process bolstering the role of international and regional human rights regimes. In particular, robust regional human rights systems have the potential to create fora for the participation of and interaction with domestic constituencies in the region. This in turn could lead to the elaboration of context sensitive, participatory solutions, grounded in international human rights law, to existing forms of discrimination against women, which during conflicts may be exacerbated, for example, in the form of sexual enslavement and abductions as reported in recent and less recent conflicts.
机译:联合国安理会第1325号决议和连续专题决议与各种报告一起形成妇女,和平与安全(WPS)议程。随后的政策和制度反应试图处理各种问题,包括妇女在武装冲突期间和武装冲突期间和武装冲突中的性暴力的参与。因此,这些反应是通过反应方法基础,重点关注冲突和冲突后性别敏感的干预领域。虽然这些仍然有价值的干预措施,但是,无论其名称,WPS议程是否不充分地解决和平情况的性别敏感领域,无论存在冲突。关于WPS议程的女权主义批评和2015年联合国全球关于执行第1325号决议的研究的调查结果和建议,该文章认为,WSP议程及其预防肢体需要更明确和全面地进行详细阐述和整合人权战略这将重点从反应性转移到主动模型,其中一个追求两性平等和妇女的人权,无论是否发生冲突都会爆发。另一方面,在一方面,一方面应在明确的理解和认可方面的含义上提出,以便就借出国际和区域人权的作用而明确的理解和认可,一方面,一方面,应以明确的了解和认可两次提出性别平等的意义制度。特别是,强大的区域人权系统有可能为与该地区的国内选区的参与创造和互动。这反过来可能导致阐述在国际人权法中基于国际人权法的上下文敏感的参与式解决方案,以解决对妇女的现有歧视形式,例如,在冲突中可能会加剧,例如,以性奴役和讨论的形式报告最近和最近的冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号