...
首页> 外文期刊>Eating and weight disorders: EWD >Developing more efficient, effective, and disseminable treatments for eating disorders: an overview of the multiphase optimization strategy
【24h】

Developing more efficient, effective, and disseminable treatments for eating disorders: an overview of the multiphase optimization strategy

机译:开发更高效,有效和不可易溶的饮食障碍治疗方法:概述多相优化策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present manuscript describes the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and its potential applications to treatments for eating disorders (EDs). The manuscript describes the three phases of MOST, discusses a hypothetical case example of how MOST could be applied to developing a disseminable ED treatment, and reviews the pros and cons of the MOST approach. Outcomes from treatments for EDs leave room for improvement. However, traditional methods of treatment development and evaluation (i.e., the treatment package approach) make it challenging to determine how best to improve ED treatments. For example, testing full treatment packages in open trials and RCTs without systematic testing of each component is inefficient (as it is unknown which components are effective), and often does not provide concrete future directions for optimization of the treatment. Much stands to be gained by optimizing treatments in the early stages before testing them in open trials or RCTs. MOST is an alternative, engineering-inspired research framework that is well-suited to address the issues of inefficiency associated with the treatment package approach. MOST entails identifying the most promising treatment components for inclusion in interventions, then eliminating or deemphasizing less efficacious/inert components. This strategy results in a treatment comprised of only effective components that can then be tested via RCT. Though the MOST approach has limitations, it has the potential to greatly benefit ED treatment research and is worthy of application in the field.
机译:目前的稿件描述了多相优化策略(大多数)及其潜在的应用来治疗饮食障碍(EDS)。稿件描述了最多的三个阶段,讨论了如何应用于开发不可易溶的ED治疗的明显案例,并审查最具方法的利弊。 EDS治疗的结果留下改善空间。然而,传统的治疗方法和评估方法(即,治疗包方法)使其具有挑战性,以确定如何最好地改善ED治疗方法。例如,在开放试验中测试完整的治疗包,RCT没有系统测试,无需每个组分的效率低下(因为它未知哪些部件是有效的),并且通常不提供用于优化治疗的混凝土方向。在在打开试验或RCT中测试它们之前优化早期阶段的治疗,可以通过优化治疗来获得许多站立。最重要的是替代,工程灵感的研究框架,非常适合解决与治疗包方法相关的低效率问题。大多数需要鉴定最有前途的治疗组分,以便在干预措施中,然后消除或深入化较少的有效/惰性组分。该策略导致一个仅由可以通过RCT测试的有效组成部分的处理。虽然最多的方法有局限性,但它有可能大大损害治疗研究,并且值得在该领域的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号