首页> 外文期刊>East Asian science, technology and society: an international journal >Yuriko Tanaka 田中祐理子, Kagaku to hyoushou: 'Byougenkin' no rekishi 科学と表象:「病原菌」の歴史 [Science and Representation: A History of 'Bacteria'] Nagoya: University of Nagoya Press, 2013. 332 pp. ¥5,400.
【24h】

Yuriko Tanaka 田中祐理子, Kagaku to hyoushou: 'Byougenkin' no rekishi 科学と表象:「病原菌」の歴史 [Science and Representation: A History of 'Bacteria'] Nagoya: University of Nagoya Press, 2013. 332 pp. ¥5,400.

机译:Yuriko Tanaka Tanaka Yuriko,Kagaku到廊府:“Byougenkin”No Rekishi科学和代表性:“细菌”的历史[科学和代表性:“细菌”的历史]名古屋:。名古屋大学出版社,2013年出版社.332 PP¥ 5,400。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Yuriko Tanaka's Science and Representation: A History of "Bacteria" consists of four case studies, each of which is devoted to a specific person: Girolamo Fracastoro, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Louis Pasteur, and Robert Koch. This structure might strike some readers, particularly those who are familiar with the history of science, as rather an old-fashioned approach. Glancing at its table of contents, I wondered whether the book intended to explore the history of its given discipline by focusing on selected prominent (male) scientists whose contributions are deemed decisive from a present-day perspective. Such old-fashioned historiography often starts by identifying the "fathers" of the discipline and then chooses some later figures to be those who finally gave it its "modern contours." In the history of microbiology, Fracastoro and Leeuwenhoek tend to play the former role, and Pasteur and Koch the latter. Though this type of progressive and positivistic narrative once flourished in the history of science, it has been subjected to severe criticism in the past few decades. Soon after I started reading her book, however, I was reassured that the author was well aware of that criticism.
机译:Yuriko Tanaka的科学和代表性:“细菌”的历史包括四个案例研究,每个案例研究都致力于特定的人:Girolamo Fracastoro,Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek,Louis Pasteur和Robert Koch。这种结构可能会袭击一些读者,特别是那些熟悉科学史的人,而是一种古老的方法。在其目录中瞥了一眼,我想知道这本书是否旨在通过专注于从当前的观点来贡献所选择的突出(男性)科学家来探讨其给定学科的历史。这种古老的历史记录往往通过识别纪律的“父亲”来开始,然后选择一些人成为那些最终给它它的“现代轮廓”的人。在微生物学的历史中,Fracastoro和Leeuwenhoek倾向于发挥以前的角色,并将巴斯特和Koch成为后者。虽然这种类型的渐进和实证叙事曾经在科学史上繁荣,但在过去的几十年里,它已经受到严重的批评。然而,在我开始阅读书后,我很高兴认识,提交人很清楚这批评。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号