首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >An open-label, multicentre, randomized, crossover study comparing sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naive to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy.
【24h】

An open-label, multicentre, randomized, crossover study comparing sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naive to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy.

机译:一项开放性,多中心,随机,交叉研究,比较了枸sil酸西地那非和他达拉非治疗未接受磷酸二酯酶5抑制剂治疗的男性勃起功能障碍。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare treatment preference, efficacy, and tolerability of sildenafil citrate (sildenafil) and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction (ED) in men naive to phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, crossover study of sildenafil and tadalafil (taken as needed). After a 4-week baseline assessment, 367 men with ED (mean age 54 years) were randomized to receive sildenafil for 12 weeks followed by tadalafil for 12 weeks or vice versa (8-week dose optimization and 4-week assessment phases). During dose optimization, patients started taking 25- or 50-mg sildenafil or 10-mg tadalafil and could titrate to find their optimum dose (25-, 50- or 100-mg sildenafil; 10- or 20-mg tadalafil). After completing both 12-week periods, patients chose which treatment to continue during an 8-week extension. Efficacy was measured with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary. RESULTS: Of the 291 men who completed both treatments, 85 (29%) chose sildenafil and 206 (71%) chose tadalafil (P < 0.001) for the 8-week extension. The IIEF erectile function domain scores were 14.2 at baseline, 23.9 at endpoint on sildenafil, and 24.3 at endpoint on tadalafil (P = 0.08, sildenafil vs tadalafil). The mean per patient percentage success scores for SEP2 (penetration) were: baseline (46%), sildenafil (post-baseline 82%) and tadalafil (post-baseline 85%; P = 0.06, sildenafil vs tadalafil), and for SEP3 (successful intercourse) were: baseline (19%), sildenafil (post-baseline 72%), and tadalafil (post-baseline 77%; P = 0.003, sildenafil vs tadalafil). The only treatment-emergent adverse events that were reported by >5% of men were headache and flushing. CONCLUSIONS: In men with ED who were naive to PDE5 inhibitor therapy, sildenafil and tadalafil were both effective and well tolerated. After treatment with sildenafil and tadalafil, 29% of men chose sildenafil and 71% chose tadalafil for ED therapy during an 8-week extension.
机译:目的:比较枸sil酸西地那非和他达拉非在未接受磷酸二酯酶5(PDE5)抑制剂治疗的男性勃起功能障碍(ED)中的治疗偏好,疗效和耐受性。患者和方法:这是西地那非和他达拉非(根据需要服用)的开放标签,交叉研究。经过4周的基线评估后,将367名ED患者(平均年龄54岁)随机接受西地那非治疗12周,然后接受他达拉非治疗12周,反之亦然(8周剂量优化和4周评估阶段)。在剂量优化过程中,患者开始服用25或50毫克西地那非或10毫克他达拉非,可以滴定以找到最佳剂量(25、50或100毫克西地那非; 10或20毫克他达拉非)。在完成两个12周的疗程后,患者选择在8周的延长期内继续哪种治疗。疗效通过国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)和性接触经历(SEP)日记进行评估。结果:在完成两项治疗的291名男性中,有8名患者(29%)选择了西地那非,而有206名男性(71%)选择了他达拉非(P <0.001)。 IIEF勃起功能域评分在基线时为14.2,在西地那非时为23.9,在他达拉非时为24.3(P = 0.08,西地那非vs他达拉非)。 SEP2(渗透)的每位患者平均成功分数百分比为:基线(46%),西地那非(基线后为82%)和他达拉非(基线后为85%; P = 0.06,西地那非vs他达拉非)和SEP3(成功的性交)为:基线(19%),西地那非(基线后为72%)和他达拉非(基线后为77%; P = 0.003,西地那非vs他达拉非)。超过5%的男性报告的唯一治疗紧急不良事件是头痛和潮红。结论:对于未接受PDE5抑制剂治疗的ED男性,西地那非和他达拉非均有效且耐受性良好。西地那非和他达拉非治疗后,在延长的8周内,有29%的男性选择了西地那非和71%的患者选择他达拉非进行ED治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号